Allen Corneau wrote on Mon, 07 February 2011 02:22 |
Joe_Caithness wrote on Sun, 06 February 2011 17:47 |
I think this is the post I most agree with, I don't call mine a Sontec, it's not, it's not built by them and therefore isn't, pretty simple.
(snip)
In my mind that seems far enough removed, an is no way advertised or talked about with clients as "A Sontec".
|
I don't know, Joe. It's cutting it awfully close, but your website seems to speak otherwise...
"Custom built "250" : Equalizer based on the classic MEP250 parametric mastering EQ from way back, brought into the future with awesome mastering mods and stepped attenuators. By Mark Watson"
|
I would have thought the language and grammar used shows this is not trying to replicate the original, the use of speech marks, language such as "based on" and no mention of the S word anywhere.
I have seen, in the past at least, MEs go on the record calling these things Sontec Clones, which have made an effort not to.
PS, here it is for anyone interested:
A link to a GS hosted image:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/attachments/mastering-forum/2 04970d1290442736t-my-first-analogue-eq-top-open.jpg