Martha Stewart denied visa for UK.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/20/usa1"The UK Border Agency said it would not comment on individual cases.
A spokesman said: "We continue to oppose the entry to the UK of individuals where we believe their presence in the United Kingdom is not conducive to the public good or where they have been found guilty of serious criminal offences abroad."
Maybe they were afraid of her bringing in weapons of mass indigestion.
While elsewhere ...
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/34161" ... that same week a British court granted bail to Islamic cleric Abu Qatada, after failing to deport him to Jordan where he is a convicted terrorist. Qatada, 47, has been described as Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe, a fund-raiser for al Qaeda and other extremist networks, an associate of convicted 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui and thwarted shoe bomber Richard Reid, and a spiritual adviser to would-be terrorists."
For the sake of perspective ...
What do R. Nixon, B. Clinton, and Martha Stewart all have in common?
They were censured for or convicted of lying, the lies themselves or the consequences therefrom causing no deaths.
OTOH, aside from instigating actions that have caused many thousands of deaths and ongoing chaos, what do GW Bush, Tony Blair, and Abu Qatada all have in common?
They have never been convicted of lying.
Maybe her name was misspelled or misread by the authorities (wait guys, that's 'Stewart', not 'Stuart'; no relation to James II at all, honest!).