Hey CC,
I have owned both the RE20 and the SM7B for a few years. After a lot of A/B-ing, I've come to the conclusion that the Shure KSM32 3/4" diaphragm condenser is a better choice than either of these mics in almost all situations. Insert caveats, IMOs, etc., etc.
Kind of outside the norm and definitely not what I expected given the history and general reputation of the RE20 and the SM7B. My clients and I agreed in all cases. When I would swap out either of these mics and put in the KSM32, everyone was happier.
I've used the KSM32 to close mic snares, I've used it in a kick drum, for tracking vocals, on guitar amps, on bass amps, and on sharply transient things like banjo and percussion, etc., etc., in a lot of different situations. It's never sounded *unusable* and many times it's been the best of the options I've had (ie: better than the SM7B or RE20 or other condensers that were around).
The KSM32 has a very flat and even response without any intentionally added presence or emphasis in the >5k range. Same general traits of quality LD dynamics.
If you're looking for a utility mic along the lines of a SM7B or RE20, see if you can check out a KSM32 and give it the same tests you have given the other mics (voice, snare, guitar). If your ears are like mine you might find it to be a better investment for all-around duties. As a bonus they are very solidly built and the stand mount that comes with it is very effective.
C.Cash wrote on Tue, 16 December 2008 12:44 |
My conclusions;
I ran tracks on both mics,
1. My voice talking. SM7- I could not seem to get a nice sound no matter what setting. I found it harsh and annoying. RE20- Much smoother than the SM7 but I find it lacks presence. However I think it will do well on other vocals.
2. Snare. SM7- Again very annoying and harsh. RE20- I think it could be usable depending on the type of song but I prefer the SM57 (flame away).
3. Guitar cabinet SM7- No way!!! zero tone, harsh. RE20- Sorry, the acm900 has me spoiled, again this mic lacks presence. IMO.
Thanks.
|