Jay Kadis wrote on Tue, 01 September 2009 20:44 |
Perhaps this explains something? http://www.prosoundnews.com/article/23768 |
bigbone wrote on Wed, 02 September 2009 08:20 |
I'm not sure that AVID really support digi even if they own it................ |
Jay Kadis wrote on Tue, 01 September 2009 14:44 |
Perhaps this explains something? http://www.prosoundnews.com/article/23768 |
compasspnt wrote on Wed, 02 September 2009 23:18 |
AD/DA-16X. |
Hank Alrich wrote on Thu, 03 September 2009 10:37 |
I don't see any mention of "direct monitoring" for the Apogees. |
Podgorny wrote on Thu, 03 September 2009 16:23 |
Seems like ASIO had all that low-latency stuff figured out years ago. Of course, you cannot monitor with plugins. And in order to handle truly complex tracking sessions, you need a system whose price rivals that of a used HD rig (which could do all these things more than six years ago). People love to sound the death knell of the juggernaut, but it's just not going to happen yet. I KNOW TDM is long in the tooth, and am looking forward to hearing whatever Digi has to announce in the coming months. I just hope it's less pro-sumer crap (ie. adding more preamps to the 003 instead of getting rid of them altogether). |
Podgorny wrote on Thu, 03 September 2009 16:23 |
People love to sound the death knell of the juggernaut, but it's just not going to happen yet. |
compasspnt wrote on Thu, 03 September 2009 11:28 |
*snip* In our fast-paced, schedule-driven, professional-studio world, this was unacceptable. |
Quote: |
So my quest for something else is still on hold. (Haven't ever used anything MH, and unlikely to have the time to experiment.) |
rankus wrote on Mon, 07 September 2009 22:01 |
running them on an RME AES32 card that is capable of real time monitoring using the RME "Total Mix" app built into the interface card. |
Podgorny wrote on Mon, 07 September 2009 21:30 | ||
Built into the interface card. Not the audio software. Satori only comes when the software controls the hardware directly, a la PRO TOOLS (or Digital Performer with MOTU hardware). But now we're back to that pesky proprietary thing. Oh bother. |
marcel wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 14:01 |
Terry was specifically referring to tracking 'through' plugins. |
Podgorny wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 17:47 |
I regularly track with TDM plugins when doing vocals. An over-compressed vocal in the cue mix can help a singer to work their performance, and I don't necessarily want to print that sound. I can do it on a native system too - with the buffer set very low, but I run out of power for the plugins that have showed up on the session by the time we're doing vocals. |
compasspnt wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 19:21 |
And what about overdubbing once the basic track is cut...? |
Sean Eldon Qualls wrote on Wed, 09 September 2009 06:49 | ||
Not sure I understand. What exactly was the problem you had with overdubbing? You would be in the overwhelming minority that has a problem overdubbing with Logic... |
marcel wrote on Wed, 09 September 2009 14:46 | ||
You can print a mix of the session for the singer to work to, import this into a new session (where processing headroom is now available again), and then export the vox back to the master session when you are done. It's a workaround, but it's not too bad if you're prepared for it. |
compasspnt wrote on Wed, 09 September 2009 18:35 |
I give up. No need rehashing this. The native system (with the latest, fastest computer), just didn't cut it in our world. Too many splits, too many workarounds. But when there is a truly professional alternative to PT, I will be the second one there. And I hope it is from Apple. |
compasspnt wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 19:21 |
I And what about overdubbing once the basic track is cut...? The native system was simply unusable for both of those scenarios. |
compasspnt wrote on Fri, 11 September 2009 03:59 |
Understood, and "Well done you." But in our client world, we have no room for "...as long as..." |
compasspnt wrote on Fri, 11 September 2009 03:59 |
Understood, and "Well done you." But in our client world, we have no room for "...as long as..." |
Fletcher wrote on Wed, 16 September 2009 13:44 | ||
If I'm not mistaken [hopefully Sean or Adam can pop on and confirm or refute this] there is a function in Logic that permits you to "monitor input" [just like on a tape machine] when you're doing overdubs. It might just be with Apogee converters [which is what is used at The Meth Lab] but if I'm not mistaken it is a part of the Logic software. I'll pop Adam / Sean an email so they can confirm [or refute] this impression. |