mikeconrad wrote on Sun, 17 October 2010 00:15 |
I can't help but overlook almost everything else. |
Edvaard wrote on Sun, 17 October 2010 02:07 |
No dearth of comedy coming from the supposedly "conservative" and supposedly "family values" crowd in a reference to "jugs" concerning someone who is obviously a daughter (how 'bout them jugs!) begot from a mother (how 'bout them jugs!), and other loved ones being a father and possibly sisters ( how 'bout her jugs?) or brothers, for whom consideration of "jugs!" might not instantly come to mind concerning such person. "Family" values indeed. |
Edvaard wrote on Sun, 17 October 2010 11:40 |
Hey sorry, wasn't directed at you specifically. I was just tired ornery and stupid. That term always bothered me for some reason. |
compasspnt wrote on Sun, 17 October 2010 23:27 |
Having recently worked with Katy, I find the direction this thread has taken to be very uncomfortable. She is a hard working professional. |
Wireline wrote on Mon, 18 October 2010 07:39 |
No disrespect intended...I've never heard her music, and all that seems to be discussed by media and her publicity people is her physical attributes. Isn't this the way she is steering the public to see her - a sex symbol that happens to sing? That's the impression I get, anyway. Again, no disrespect intended - just following what I perceive as the hype. |
compasspnt wrote on Mon, 18 October 2010 00:27 |
Having recently worked with Katy, I find the direction this thread has taken to be very uncomfortable. She is a hard working professional. |
Barry Hufker wrote on Fri, 29 October 2010 13:57 |
So what's the message here? |
Barry Hufker wrote on Fri, 29 October 2010 13:57 |
So what's the message here? |