Adam Miller wrote on Tue, 08 December 2009 06:59 |
Now... I find talking about sample rates as tedious as the next man... I'm just slightly intrigued as to why most people seem to working at 48k. What are you gaining? Ad |
Seb RIOU wrote on Wed, 09 December 2009 19:17 |
Anti aliasing filter set 2kHz further. As it may be the weakest point in the converter, the further the better for me. |
Seb RIOU wrote on Wed, 09 December 2009 19:17 |
Anti aliasing filter set 2kHz further. the further the better for me. |
NelsonL wrote on Thu, 10 December 2009 13:18 |
IMP sample rate errors are funny, but if your ME pulls that on you... run. Correct me if I'm wrong, but SRC seems moot if your mastering with an analog chain or printing your mixes to tape, as I prefer to do. In either of those cases, your ME may or may not SRC, depending on their work flow. In every case, they'll do what they think sounds the best-- as should we all. |
robdarling@mail.com wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 05:43 | ||
Mixing ITB is very common for a lot of people, in particular around here. Creating a multitrack at 48 is not an ideal thing to do if it is not destined for analog. If you have complete control of a project and it is your own, do as you will. But as an engineer for hire, creating a 48k project for a client is not a such a good idea. r |
NelsonL wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 14:56 | ||||
Mixing ITB is moot though, unless you're effectively mastering the thing yourself, there's no need to SRC anything other than a ref. I can see your point Rob, but given the popularity of 48k sessions, I'd expect any engineer for hire to handle even an unlabeled session correctly. In fact, that's just one more way in which IMP is a great learning tool. |
j.hall wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 19:55 |
i guess i just don't see how it matters. 44.1 or 48. why is one a good idea or bad idea? 88.2 and 96 sound better to me. but i honestly just don't care. if you send me something to work on, it is what it is, and i'll do the best job i can either way. |
NelsonL wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 21:14 |
Remember D-88s? I think it was more relevant in those days. |