janek wrote on Mon, 16 March 2009 21:47 |
...is it so that by choosing these room modes you will NOT be having all sorts of peaks and dips in the spectrum,... |
Quote: |
the chanches are better in getting a more even spread of freq. rsponse across a room if you build it according to room ratio's |
janek wrote on Tue, 17 March 2009 06:15 |
Should i bother in getting an angle in the ceiling ? |
jimmyjazz wrote on Wed, 18 March 2009 19:01 |
Food for thought that won't really help Janek . . . while "ideal" (or at least recommended) room ratios are independent of room size, it's also true that bigger is in general better. One reason is because a larger room of a given proportionality will experience response "lumpiness" lower in the spectrum than a smaller room will; i.e., the response will be "smooth" in a bigger percentage of the audio spectrum. But I have also read research on room design (Trevor Cox, perhaps?) that suggests the most ideal ratios vary with room volume. I need to dig that paper up . . . |
Steve Hudson wrote on Thu, 19 March 2009 11:50 | ||
I just read a similar study last week which provided different ratios for three different room volumes. |
Bruno Gouveia wrote on Sun, 22 March 2009 00:48 | ||
According to the guys at RPG, 1:2,19:3 is one of the best for an optimized low frequency response, which gives a room looking like this, for 125m Post by: jimmyjazz on March 22, 2009, 04:45:27 PM Post by: Steve Hudson on March 22, 2009, 07:40:27 PM
[never mind] Post by: Bruno Gouveia on March 23, 2009, 06:49:06 PM Authors: Cox, Trevor J.; D'Antonio, Peter; Avis, Mark R. I've the pdf of the article, if anyone wants it I don't mind to forward. http://damping.tumblr.com/post/51371077/according-to-an-aes- article-of-some-important Post by: franman on March 25, 2009, 10:24:42 PM Post by: jimmyjazz on March 27, 2009, 06:31:15 PM Post by: franman on April 02, 2009, 10:12:59 AM FM Post by: jimmyjazz on April 03, 2009, 01:12:19 PM Post by: franman on April 06, 2009, 11:42:04 AM FM |