Podgorny wrote on Thu, 11 March 2010 22:01 |
Everybody else - Great job. |
Seb Riou wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 02:59 |
Oh yeah, one thing I forgot. What really made a difference between the mixes are vocal placement. Some made it really wide and come up front. Since it's an Indie Mixing Project, that kinda surprised. In indy rock I always see (hear) the vocals in the mix, almost behind the snare, and surrounded by a wall of guitars. That's what I tried to do, and yeah I know that's what J.Hall achieved ! |
Hallams wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 05:10 |
Well H2... thanks for the insights, but i think the bottom end in my mix is more of a problem than the snare....on ordinary playback systems i didn't pick it up but when i played my mix back in the studio i think it could be wound back in the low end a bit. One thing for sure, you really are flying blind to some elements in the mix if your monitoring is not up to scratch.... confession time...i did the mix at 44.1 and after i realized, my mix was done, i was out of the studio so i simply changed the sample rate and bounced the mp3 most of the mix translated ok but for the lows....couldn't help but thinking the original recording had the vari speed wound up a notch. |
h2o2 wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 11:47 |
The worst thing they honestly believe they are professional mixing engineers. |
johnR wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 07:06 | ||
The fact that most of them are paid good money by satisfied customers for their mixes is perhaps what leads them to believe that. How about you? |
h2o2 wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 13:15 |
Taking into account variety of customers and variety of ppl out there and especially knowing that loudness war there or even just average customer level of education and understanding i would say thet is a VERY VERY weak argument... and professionalism of mixing engineer does the faaar less difference then professionalism of talking shit and making PR for the customer... also alot of customers are happy with bad records. they just make this as a hobby or to show to the friends, etc. I won't comment anymore any point about money or ROI because of that is a way too boring... ppl who use that point are small and grey... |
Daniel Farris wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 09:56 |
So, this is the first time I've listened to all the IMP submissions in quite this way, and it's been very revealing. For those of you with the horsepower to do so, I highly recommend this: I imported all of the mixes into a single PT session, lined them up, turned off solo latch, did a quick level match, and then ran the song in a loop, going down the console and soloing various mixes, without knowing whose mix I was hearing. Wow. Never mind balance choices; some of the overall tonal differences are staggering. The people who have obvious problems with monitoring/room tuning were instantly obvious. I'm still listening, so I don't have detailed critiques, but I really love listening to them like this. DF |
2pulse wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 07:41 |
Once thing I noticed.... NO ONE panned the intro guitar to the right of center. I was never conciously aware of this convention, but apparently I adhere to it. |
h2o2 wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 05:47 | ||
Nothing should be surprising here... there is just a bunch of kids here. Who decided among themself that they are somebody they are not. The worst thing they honestly believe they are professional mixing engineers. C'mon get to the ground finally... |
2pulse wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 09:41 |
Big variety! Lots of creative edits, some work some don't. I'll have to do my reviews in installments, as listening to 30 versions of the same track is quite a test of endurance. Once thing I noticed.... NO ONE panned the intro guitar to the right of center. I was never conciously aware of this convention, but apparently I adhere to it. |
h2o2 wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 08:46 |
Mafigi: Can be a good mix if not a) Vocal b) Snare. This is probably a worst snare here. Vocal is behind everything it is even behind backing vocals... Why cymbals are soo close while rest of drums are soo distant? |
j.hall wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 12:28 |
for my reviews i'll only listen to the intro, verse and 1st chorus. KNOW that when reading. if you did anything "fancy" past that point, i'll never hear it. NelsonL holy lowend batman. what are they doing to you over there in Dubai? that bottom end is swallowing your mix alive. listening around it, there are some really cool things going on here. that vocal delay is nicely placed. |
NelsonL wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 15:10 | ||
Ha! I was afraid that might happen. Apparently supporting my wife's career has given me a swollen bottom. You just convinced me to buy better headphones though. |
j.hall wrote on Fri, 12 March 2010 21:28 |
Seb Riou LOWEND!!! wonder if you have an acoustics issue. the bottom is HUGE, top is ducked. vocal feels quiet and a bit dark. if you tamed that bottom down you'd probably have something pretty cool. guitars feel good to me. |
Seb Riou wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 03:30 | ||
I think you're right, something wrong with my room here. I always thought it had a 125 Hz bump but never care to treat, so got used to mix with a bassy sound (Focals Solo 6Be w/o sub here). Lately clients recalled for more kick and bass, so I guess I tried to mix with an over lowish environment, and lost perspective ! Time for a real room tuning, for high ends too. It's funny cos at first I dug mixes that sounded close to mine (Nelson L. I loved yours !) before realising we were in the bushes .. When I listened carefully to Yoink's, J.'s, and Adam Miller's, I was like "Duh ! THEY got it Right". Great lesson.. |
Seb Riou wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 07:05 |
Hi Nelson, funny you say that, cos there's a spot near the entrance door that's got BIG subs. I always figured it was a build up with a corner wall, I gues I was wrong. Could I have both a 125/140 Hz bump and a 60/80 Hz dip at mix pos? Nevermind, analyser is on its way for an accurate measure ! Thanks for the tip |
grantis wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 09:16 |
If I remember correctly...a 60 hz wave is about 3 feet long. |
bblackwood wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 09:23 | ||
Speed of sound - 1130 ft/sec @ nominal temperature (20C). 1130fps/60Hz = ~19' wavelength. A 3' wavelength would occur at a frequency of about ~380Hz. |
Daniel Farris wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 09:39 |
So remember... always mic a bass amp or bass drum from at *least* 19 feet away. |
bblackwood wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 08:55 |
That and headphones... |
mcsnare wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 11:52 |
Why y'all gotta be hatin' on my slap? |
mcsnare wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 06:52 |
Why y'all gotta be hatin' on my slap? Seriously, I've found over the years that the interaction between the mixer and client is important to get a great mix. We (the mixers) should go for it and get crazy, then the artists either like it, want it crazier, or want to tone down some aspect. Or all of the above. I always like to hear what the artists' reaction is and I know from experience whatever I do on my own will not be as cool as the final mix which is a process of give and take. Which is to say that part of being a good mixer is to not get massively attached to every decision that you make. I think most of the mixes that people did on this tune are pretty good. Better overall than some of the IMPs in the past. I think J.'s analysis of each submission is pretty right on, and I don't think I'd have a lot to add that he hasn't already said. Dave |
Quote: |
Grantis - Ok, these drums are a bit more like it. The execution is lacking in finesse... the sample kind of just 'sits' there... but the attitude is getting closer to the ballpark. Feels like a bit of phase jizz throwing the guitars out really wide? Maybe a bit too much in a track like this. Compression is OTT overall, and the tonality is bright... this is tiring to listen to for long. But the attitude is getting there. |
Adam Miller wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 16:30 |
Rankus - Intro reverb feels a bit cheap. It's all quite thin and bright... not so sure about the vocal slap. Balance is there, and it's compressed well- it just doesn't hit me like it should. Partial vibe castration for want of a better term... the chorus swaggers like it should though. |
Adam Miller wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 19:30 |
Meverylame - Like the mids on the intro guits- the top end just needs to be opened up. it's ok, but everything just doesn't hang together that well. Again, drums need more oomph. |
Adam Miller wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 18:30 |
Spike - bottom end is thin and bit pinched, but the balance is pretty good. Jangly guit melody bits are a bit distracting. The mix as a whole needs to be a bit bolder and assertive- harder panning with the guitars, more punch with the drums. Do I hear some sample flamming on the snare fills? Kick needs work to make it punch as well. Overall vibe is cool though. Whereabouts do you work? |
grantis wrote on Sat, 13 March 2010 23:48 |
Spike intro Guitar Panned right of center!!!! Well done (only since nobody thus far did it). Other than that, this mix is lackluster. Vocal too loud, drums distant, guitars quiet. |
Adam Miller wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 01:30 |
Unfortunately I'm listening on headphones Mafigi - STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPRESSOR!! It's so flattened and distorted, I can't hear past that, sorry! |
mafigi wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 10:09 | ||
Thanks for listening, I do not think that other listeners have heard all this compression you heard my mix to a proper control room? ... |
Adam Miller wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 11:29 |
It feels like there's something biting into the rms region of the guitars- like they've been blasted through Vintage Warmer or something. And the drums are set quite far back in comparison as well. |
Spike wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 07:29 |
The Way Studio, over near London Fields... but at the moment I'm in NYC doing nothing but pop/rap sessions which is a far cry from the rock and jazz back home, probably why I'm a bit rusty |
Spike wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 07:29 |
Thanks for the comments, I'm curious as to the "harder panning" comment as the rhythm guitars are panned 100 % left and right! |
Spike wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 07:29 |
Before I go in too deeply, in most of these submissions I felt the vocals were too far back. I know it's an "indie" thing but every single engineer I've worked with over here has hammered into me that the vocal treatment is crucial to making something a bestseller, and that you can get away with a lot if the vocals sound amazing. |
Spike wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 07:29 |
... where are you based? |
Adam Miller wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 16:49 |
Good stuff, I think those kind of pop/rap tracking sessions are where some of the most interesting stuff happens in music right now... there's nothing like a producer turning up to a session with nothing but a laptop and logic and building a track from the ground up in a couple of hours. |
Spike wrote on Sun, 14 March 2010 20:06 |
Grantis - nice drums, snare feels like it could be blended in a bit more? Depending on how modern of a sound you were going I'd say that the mix feels a bit too wet, which combined with the lack of attack on the guitars makes everything feel like blurry |
Spike wrote on Mon, 15 March 2010 02:06 |
Sriou - something weird is going on with that snare sample - on some hits it sounds fine, on others it sounds metallic and a bit like a "clank" |
Quote: |
Reno Said: Whaouw... J.Hall How you make it? What do you use to inflate, enhance the sound like this Your guitars are... great! lots of harmonics and presence what's your secret... please tell me Hedd crane song? OTB mixing? analog summing? aphex?? |
Quote: |
thanks for the kind words. my mix has plenty wrong with it. totally missed the boat on the vocal level. rookie mistake....... the guitars are just EQ'd, and they have the crane song phoenix plug-in on them "guitar 3" has a compressor on it that's working fairly hard actually. here is a pic of the plugs on my guitars. guitar 1 and 2 are identical EQ's and crane songs. screen shot is left to right, guitar 1 (and 2), guitar 3, and solo. there are a few other subtle things happening to the guitars as well, but they don't really amount to much other then depth of field and vibe. hopefully i answered the question..... |
j.hall wrote on Wed, 17 March 2010 16:00 |
Page two of the submission thread, reviews: |