compasspnt wrote on Mon, 29 March 2010 11:45 |
We had the smaller Furman system here for years in Studio A, and still have it now moved into our Studio B But recently we got the larger Furman 16 system for A...man, what a huge difference. It is so much better. |
maarvold wrote on Mon, 29 March 2010 17:03 |
I used to work at a place that had the small Furman system. I could just never fully get what I felt the players needed on the pots--not quite enough flexibility. And I don't know if they had it set up wrong, but the thing had no headroom--it would distort at just slightly above normal levels. In my [limited] experience with it, the big system seems MUCH better: more flexible and a lot more guts headroom-wise... |
j.hall wrote on Tue, 30 March 2010 12:43 |
BTW, we use the small furman here. haven't had a complaint yet. |
compasspnt wrote on Tue, 30 March 2010 20:53 | ||
Unless you let them use the big one, and then go back... |
j.hall wrote on Wed, 31 March 2010 21:53 |
talk back on every box?????!!!!!! i'm sold! although, drums and acoustic guitars are the only thing on the other side of the glass. so communication is pretty simple. |
Podgorny wrote on Fri, 02 April 2010 08:59 |
...too many engineers use them as a crutch because they cannot be bothered with or are simply incapable of getting a good mix while tracking. |
j.hall wrote on Fri, 02 April 2010 14:03 |
...we have a pretty solid mix up at the time... |
jwhynot wrote on Fri, 02 April 2010 16:56 |
#1 key to a great stereo mix in the cans? Great sounds at the desk inputs. If I'm spending a lot of time dealing with cans, I immediately begin to suspect my microphone placement. |