Post by: Pingu on January 18, 2006, 07:16:02 AM
objectively more listener friendly in mono, would you say this master has been mastered "better"
Post by: zetterstroem on January 18, 2006, 07:25:41 AM
Post by: bobkatz on January 18, 2006, 06:41:32 PM
| Pingu wrote on Wed, 18 January 2006 07:16 |
IF you a/b 2 different masters of the same mix and one sounds objectively more listener friendly in mono, would you say this master has been mastered "better" |
"Better", maybe, in that one specific respect. But it is perfectly possible to have a rich, large presentation in stereo with not to large losses in mono. There is always an ambience loss in mono.
I'd rather have a master that sounds better in stereo than another master as long as the losses in mono are not that great.
But when you say "listener-friendly", can you elaborate?
BK
Post by: Pingu on January 19, 2006, 03:41:44 AM
You have anwered my question nicely
thanks
Is it just me
cause i hate mono.
how long will we have to endure mono broadcasts for.