bblackwood wrote on Thu, 22 April 2004 22:40 |
Yes, lower freqs require longer release times than higher freqs... |
dcollins wrote on Sat, 24 April 2004 03:35 |
The trick is to get the limiter to figure out the shortest release time that still sounds good. That's what the ARC is up to. |
dcollins wrote on Sat, 24 April 2004 03:35 |
The trick is to get the limiter to figure out the shortest release time that still sounds good. That's what the ARC is up to. |
Quote: |
The trick is to get the limiter to figure out the shortest release time that still sounds good. That's what the ARC is up to. |
OTR-jkl wrote on Sat, 24 April 2004 20:39 | ||
How do it know...? |
Quote: |
I'm a sucker for super fast release times. That'll really put some carbonation into a mix. |
Quote: |
Longer release times not only for lower frequencies, but also for RMS content. Higher frequencies and peak transients require faster release times than lower freq's and low level content. |
Quote: |
On a similar note: Generally speaking, is it typical for release times for compression to be longer than those for limiting? |
OTR-jkl wrote on Mon, 26 April 2004 12:03 |
All good info Ronny, but I don't think you understood my Q... When applying both comp & limiting to a track during mastering, is the release time for the comp generally longer than the release time for the limiter (assuming no ARC)? Or does it even follow any such guideline? |