Bill Mueller wrote on Mon, 29 August 2005 18:56 |
No experience with the DSP in either box, but the ML is, well, lets just say it has a very small fan club when it comes to processing...
DC
|
That list has, at least in the past, included GM.
Best Regards,
Bill[/quote]
Are you saying that GM endorsed the DSP in the Masterlink? I heard it directly from the horse's mouth that GM was approached to produce a process for the Masterlink (it was either an EQ or a comp, I can't remember) and they turned it down when they learned what the MIPs budget was. I concur with DC that the Masterlink's DSP should not be used for anything but, (perhaps) demos. And frankly, if you can afford a Masterlink, you can afford Wavelab and a few decent plugins, which will give superior performance to what the ML can provide.