R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?  (Read 7826 times)

Larrchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3972
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #30 on: August 19, 2005, 08:03:35 PM »

This Opamp looks promising.
http://www.globalnetvillage.com/images/op.jpg

L. Janus
Logged
Larry Janus
http://2ubes.net

vernier

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 809
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #31 on: August 19, 2005, 08:18:40 PM »

If your clock-radio has decent sized magnets (which some Teac's do) it can sound quite nice ..especially with an awesome CD such as the mighty IICORMN.
Logged

dcollins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2815
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #32 on: August 19, 2005, 10:36:02 PM »

Larrchild wrote on Fri, 19 August 2005 17:03

This Opamp looks promising.
http://www.globalnetvillage.com/images/op.jpg

L. Janus



Unless you have to drive a load.

Where did the schema come from?

A NIKE missile?

DC

Tim Gilles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 189
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2005, 01:16:09 PM »

dcollins wrote on Fri, 19 August 2005 22:36

Larrchild wrote on Fri, 19 August 2005 17:03

This Opamp looks promising.
http://www.globalnetvillage.com/images/op.jpg

L. Janus



Unless you have to drive a load.

Where did the schema come from?

A NIKE missile?

DC


Ya know.... I lay in bed at 10am this morning laughing like a madman because this quote(which I first read a day or two ago....), suddenly popped in my head for no apparent reason. I managed to inadvertently wake my wife, who inquired dryly about the source of my mirth, and realized I would be hard pressed to explain WHAT exactly was so funny about the quip in less than an hours time.

I think it would qualify as a instance of empathic humor.

Tim "Rumblefish" Gilles

Bob Olhsson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3968
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #34 on: August 21, 2005, 01:23:34 PM »

dcollins wrote on Fri, 19 August 2005 21:36


Unless you have to drive a load.

Don't bring THAT up...
Smile

dcollins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2815
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #35 on: August 21, 2005, 01:46:10 PM »

Tim Gilles wrote on Sun, 21 August 2005 10:16


Ya know.... I lay in bed at 10am this morning laughing like a madman because this quote(which I first read a day or two ago....), suddenly popped in my head for no apparent reason. I managed to inadvertently wake my wife, who inquired dryly about the source of my mirth, and realized I would be hard pressed to explain WHAT exactly was so funny about the quip in less than an hours time.

I think it would qualify as a instance of empathic humor.




And to think for once I was being serious!  (mostly)

They used tube opamps in the NIKE missles, and it would have been around the time Bel Losmandy was designing aerospace stuff..

That said, I take laughs wherever I can get 'em, so thank you.

DC

thedoc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1218
Re: The IC debate - a more "scientific" approach?
« Reply #36 on: August 21, 2005, 01:56:21 PM »

Losmandy's DOG would laugh.
Logged
Doc
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 21 queries.