jamesp wrote on Fri, 17 June 2005 10:07 |
It is more a case of the image and cue file being more universal - and human readable. In 20 years time when Wavelab is obsolete you probably won't be able to read its cd layout files. You'll still be able to read the cue files with a basic text editor.
|
Bingo. I've learned that there are very few formats that stand the test of time in any digital media. In terms of digital audio, based solely on what the cue sheet and image are made of, it seems to me the best option to ensure the longevity of a backup. I have no idea how long steinberg or wavelab will be around, whether or not they'll even continue a backward compatible montage format...you can really apply that logic to any particular piece of software for that matter. The image + cue sheet is pretty infallible though...even if the format becomes defunct, you can easily recreate the
exact original just by reading the cue sheet in a text editor and applying everything to the image (one long pcm wave file) manually.
As far as I know, there are no
technical advantages regarding authoring or burning with wavelab versus plextools or some other program. But the auto-check features in XL post burn are attractive...