R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Stephen Sank snake oil  (Read 16115 times)

laptoppop

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Stephen Sank snake oil
« on: September 26, 2004, 07:35:42 pm »

Darn it!  I was cruising by Stephen's website after reading a recent posting about ribbon microphones.

I'm sure he does a fine job on microphones, but what dissapointed me is that they are selling overpriced silver DIGITAL cables and making the usual audiophile claims (they improve the soundstage, etc.)  This makes me question his quality and ear in general.  Darn it.  A digital cable is a digital cable.

-lee-
Logged

hargerst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1458
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2004, 08:44:50 pm »

Well, he has the skills down on the mic end of things, but he is also a dedicated audiophile. So, when it comes to things "hi-fi", you gotta take that into consideration.

Remember, "snake oil" is the lubricant of choice in the audiophile world.
Logged
Harvey "Is that the right note?" Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio

fishtop

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2004, 01:18:52 am »

There is no such thing as a digital cable.
All cables are analog. Even the fiber optic
cables use analog modulation of the signal,
and then detect some trigger level/voltage.

There are no digital wires, either.

Pat

(Brian) Frost

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2004, 02:51:29 pm »

There are wires designed to pass a digital bitstream tho.  Actually, there isnt anything purely digital in the real world.  Its always an analog charge (or similar) representing a digital 1 or 0 which is a digital bit representing something analog.

Frost
Logged
Frost
Owner, Narnia Productions
Chicago IL

Good is good but not as good as better

Pramrod

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2004, 08:13:56 pm »

I don't know nothing bout no stinkin digital cable, but Stephen does wonderful work on ribbons. i have a bunch of mics he has reribboned and fixed up for me and they all rock! rca, american, b&o, beyer m160's- yes!!! he definately knows his stuff in that area and is both reasonably priced and cool to talk to. so i'd take the rest with a grain of salt. now digital cable, that sounds scary...
Logged

Brent Handy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 171
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2004, 02:45:20 pm »

There was a story floating around how an "audiophile" amplifier designer/manufacturer had done some research with the help of a homeopathic anti-digital guru.  The Doc said that CD's effected the nervous system negatively, etc.

At an AES show they had an analog and digital recording of the same material.  They played for the audience, like "see there"?  Meanwhile all of the engineers in the audience are snickering because all audio was passing through the digital DSP for the FOH and delay ring speaker systems.

I like those new $1000 6' extension cables that people are selling now.  Like the 15 million miles of aluminum cable transporting the badly modulating power is gonna get fixed with that new super cable.

Whatever.
Logged

Fletcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2004, 11:27:36 am »

Well Pramrod, let me espouse an opposing viewpoint... I know of more than a couple of mics that were butchered by Mr. Sank, as in butchered to the point of not being useable.

These were not RCA mics, I have no idea what kind of work he does on RCA mics, but the work I have seen/heard on B&O and Beyer Dynamic ribbon mics is only inches short of a criminal offense.

If you have had an acceptable experience, great... but I have no idea to what you are comparing Sank's work.  My comparitive reference is from mics that I have had serviced over the years by Clarence Kane of ENAK Microphone Repair in Pittman, NJ, and from mics I have had serviced by Wes Dooley of Audio Engineering Associates in Pasadena, CA.

Both Clarence and Wes do exceptional work.  Clarence, because he is on the east coast does the majority of the work required on my RCA mics, while Wes does all the work on my Coles mics and some of my RCA stuff [if I have mics going to him anyway, then he gets the RCA work too].
Logged
CN Fletcher

mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid


"Recording engineers are an arrogant bunch.  
If you've spent most of your life with a few thousand dollars worth of musicians in the studio, making a decision every second and a half... and you and  they are going to have to live with it for the rest of your lives, you'll get pretty arrogant too.  It takes a certain amount of balls to do that... something around three"
Malcolm Chisholm

Stephen Sank

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2005, 01:56:58 pm »

Thank you, Tim Hudson, for drawing my attention to this thread, on this forum that I don't generally monitor.
Once again, Fletcher, you tempt me to sue your ass for slander.  You know NOTHING of my work, and yet you continue your completely unprovoked vendetta against me.  As far as I have ever seen you post about, you have seen only ONE example of my work, a B&O mic that was VERY DEFINITELY damaged in shipping on the return trip to the owner.  This owner unfortunately did not give me any opportunity to fix that mic before you got your mits on it, so now I have to put up with your b.s. about it.  I will warn you one more time- IF YOU CONTINUE THIS UNWARRANTED SLANDER AGAINST ME ON THIS OR OTHER FORUMS, I WILL SUE YOU.
As for my digital cable, I would ask that anyone who thinks it's "snake oil" take the time to do some actual a/b comparisons between digital interconnects in a high resolution system.  Differences DO exist, and are quite often very, very large.  In fact, I have to myself & others on many, many occassions that a digital cable can make more difference than any other cable in a system.  And if you think mine is expensive, try checking out the competition, e.g., Purist Audio Designs, Nordost, DH Labs, Kimber, etc.
Logged
Stephen Sank
Talking Dog Transducer Co.

hargerst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1458
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2005, 10:34:39 am »

As a balance to Fletcher's experience, I should point out that Stephen did an incredible job reworking both my Beyer M260 and Mike Rivers' M260, and he was working on a couple of Dan Kennedy's ribbon mics when I was there.  I actually took pictures of him cutting and making the ribbon, and I can attest to his dedication in carrying on his father's work.

I haven't listened to any of the audiophile "esoteric cables", so I can't say whether they make any significant difference or not.  I'm old school, so a short run of a 12 ga. pair of copper wires into a banana plug (into the side hole and tightened down - a lot) still works good enough for me.

I still will not hesitate to recommend Stephen's work on ribbon mics, and he's a nice guy.
Logged
Harvey "Is that the right note?" Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio

laptoppop

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2005, 05:53:06 pm »

Mr Sank,

Thank you for looking at this thread.  In terms of the digital cable, I have a hard time understanding any possible way that it would work.  I would expect the analog characteristics of the cable to be irrelevant in a properly clocked digital environment.  The rise/fall times of the cable, for example, happen before or after the digital sampling period.  The actual voltage transferred is typically applied to a schmidt trigger style device and again results in either a 1 or zero corresponding voltage.

Have you done any true double blind comparisons between your cables and other (much cheaper) quality cables?  I don't mean total junk cables where the connectors are lousy - I'm talking decent cables, but not audiophile.

For example, I would expect a test setup that allowed you to switch the cables back and forth quickly and randomly -- (this is important)WITHOUT THE LISTENER KNOWING WHICH WAS WHICH (preferably in an automated manner so that no one in the room even knows which is which until the results are tabulated).  Have you done any testing like that?  I'm sure you understand the power that our expectations have in affecting how we hear things.

Thank you again for your time,
-lee-
Logged

buddy holly

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2005, 09:29:06 am »

hargerst wrote on Mon, 24 January 2005 15:34


I still will not hesitate to recommend Stephen's work on ribbon mics, and he's a nice guy.


Stephen Sank did the BX mod to a B&O BM6 for me and its sounds absolutely beautiful.  I would also agree that he is a very nice guy and is passionate about his work.

--BH
Logged

Brusby

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2005, 12:00:25 am »

Don't have a clue about S. Sank's mic repair.

But, regarding silver wire . . . I have a few thoughts based on listening experiences.  Dating back many years to the time of Levinson silver interconnect, I've listened to every set I had the opportunity to audition.  Until I came to the conclusion that none ever sounded right to me.  At first I thought 100% silver stranded cable was more detailed and open sounding than copper types.  

There was more apparent top end and detail, but it came at a price. Things would just seem to jump out of the mix (sorry for the in-artful description) in inappropriate ways.  And there was just a certain unnaturalness to the presentation.

I finally quit trying silver stuff several years ago, and there's the distinct possibility things have improved since then. But I doubt it.

One of the big selling points of silver's aficionados is that it has  much lower resistance than copper.  While that is correct, unless I've been given inaccurate information, silver has much higher impedance than copper.  So, silver presents a signal in the audio spectrum with  resistances/impedances that can vary quite drastically with frequency.  Does this explain the negative things I've heard?  I don't know.  I'd like to know what others think.
Logged

JGreenslade

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 824
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2005, 03:02:56 pm »

If you want to see some stats on various cable scenarios go to Dan Lavry's forum and check the "cables" thread.

IIRC, Silver has around 0.2% less resistance than copper, which means you'll have to run the cable a hell of a long way to notice any difference.

If your speakers are in China and the amp's in the US you might notice something  Razz

Justin
Logged
Audio is a vocational affliction

"there is no "homeopathic" effect in bits and bytes." - HansP

Norwood

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 223
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #13 on: March 01, 2005, 12:09:11 am »

There is a company called JPS that makes cables, interconnects, etc., they have developed a material called Alumiloy.  A friend of mine that is a ME incrementally rewired his entire studio with the stuff and raves about it.  He then changed his digital cables and said he noticed an immediate difference.  He was astounded that there was a difference with the switch in digital cables, which simply deliver 1s and 0s.  I never got to hear the sytem before the rewire but I trust him and his ears implicitly.  I'd buy the snake oil if I felt I need it.
Logged
Michael Norwood
Wood Bros. Productions

sdevino

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 153
Re: Stephen Sank snake oil
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2005, 06:49:39 am »

.....and I always notice that my car runs better after I wash it as well..

Anyone who buys into the digital cable issue has never worked with high performance digital transceiver timing.   A cable CAN effect the digital performance, but it is likely to be catastrohpic as in, it goes from working to not working, not subtle.

Crappy cables that are too long combined with digital transceiver IC's that cannot drive the excess capacitance of the cable will fail to generate valid 1's or 0's which you hear as drop outs or no audio.

The other challenge is proper termination. The cable needs to look like a a well distributed set of impedences, which most decent Radio shack quality cable can do quite well, especially at the exceedingly low frequency of digital audio. More important is the cable termination at either end. If the cable termination (which is typically built into the box and never the cable is not well matched then you get standing waves and reflections in the cable (just like a audio in a poorly designed room). The Cable termination does the same thing as a bass trap. The reflections will result in invalid digital levels whichyou will hear as dropouts or no audio.

Jitter is not usally an issue because the detectors used in most transceivers do not look at the edge but wait a certain amount of time after the edge occurs to look at the level.

The audiophile world has never published a single actual fact about anything. They are the equivalent to electronic wrinkle, and weight loss cures.

Rant off.

Steve
Logged
Steve Devino

Granite Rocks Recording Studios
Studio gear design and setup
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up