R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Who is not using sub(s)?  (Read 6623 times)

Waltz Mastering

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
  • Real Full Name: Tom Waltz
Re: Who is not using sub(s)?
« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2012, 10:51:19 am »

K&H O300 D

I've recently read that the last pair of these and 0 300 have been sold from the factory and that they've been discontinued,.. which is a bummer because I've heard nothing but good things about them.

Herbeck

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29
  • Real Full Name: Ulf Herbeck
Re: Who is not using sub(s)?
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2012, 02:32:10 pm »

I've recently read that the last pair of these and 0 300 have been sold from the factory and that they've been discontinued,.. which is a bummer because I've heard nothing but good things about them.

I've heard rumors of this for some time.

I'm quite happy with these speakers and my room, and I'm so used to the sound that the thought of changing speakers or room almost seems scary.
Logged

dietrich

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
  • Real Full Name: ds
Re: Who is not using sub(s)?
« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2012, 08:18:26 am »

I have been on the fence past week with regards to trying out a pair of Dunlavy SC1 or SM1 with two subs in the room. Yes going against my goal of two full range that do not need subs.


What are people experiences with either SC or SM?

My next monitors choices of ATC SCM100 or Geithain 901 will not make 2012 budget. Dunlavy SC-IvA placement issues stress me out :-\

Tyler D1 moving back to the top....
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up