R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Getting that Guitar on tape sound  (Read 5317 times)

alanfc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« on: August 30, 2004, 04:21:42 AM »

hello-

I'm going to be recording alot of guitars on our band's CD (fun amateur project), and was going to use my 20+ year old Fostex 4 track cassette job. Just tried it- its dead.

so if I get me another one of these multitrack cassette recorders like this, will I get my "to-Tape" sound?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=4 1480&item=3740507294&rd=1

I don't have =alot= of experience with real tape vs. digital recording, but I've been doing it digital for awhile and thought I'd try tape just for fun again. I don't really know what I'm looking for as far as recorded tone for this CD, but I'd hate to pass up something easy like this , atleast to try.

what do you think?

this is just for the guitars... I'll transfer it into my recording software
Logged

NelsonL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1233
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2004, 01:45:56 PM »

Unless you want a really lo-fi guitar sound, then no-- that thing won't add any magic it will just trash up your sound. You'd be better off with a nice mic pre. Or if you're set on tape as a signal processor, get something better like an Otari 1/2" machine.

Logged

Brett Mixter Rader

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2004, 03:05:08 PM »

In my experience cheap digital sounds much better than cheap analog (and I am a confirmed analog head)
maybe you could rent a decent 2 track to use as a huge plug-in?

alanfc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2004, 05:24:11 PM »


thanks guys

yeah I think I'm going to re-think this

perhaps save for a good used reel to reel.

1/2" or 1/4"

I may rent something indeed, to see if I can hear a significant difference
Logged

hargerst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1458
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2004, 04:22:42 PM »

If your recording software or soundcard has provisions for a mic input, a Shure SM-57 in front of your amp should be all you need to get a great sound.
Logged
Harvey "Is that the right note?" Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio

alanfc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2004, 01:52:45 PM »


thanks Harvey, yes this is what I've been doing and I've been satisfied indeed.

but I always wonder 'what if'.
Logged

John Ivan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3028
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2004, 04:04:08 PM »

Hi all;

I really like the sound of tape but, Very narrow format analog wont get you what you want ,{i don't think}. I had a tascam 80-8 that I really liked. These are 1/2" machines that use DBX. I happen to like this sound on most things. These machines are still around and are quite cheap. Having said that, If you dial up a good tone and slap a 57 in front of it,as Harvey has mentioned, you should get a fine sound. I do love tape though.

Note; DBX and NR in general dose leave artifacts on the audio. It just so happens that I like that strange DBX sound. There is nothing pure about it however..
Logged
"Transformation is no easy trick: It's what art promises and usually doesn't deliver." Garrison Keillor

 

floodstage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 543
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2004, 11:55:33 AM »

I've still got my Tascam 38 which is similar to the 80-8.
It's a 1/2" 8 track reel to reel also.  I believe the 80-8 is a bit sturdier though.
I paid 4250 for the 38 & DBX in the early 80's.
It sounds a far cry better than a 4 track cassette porta studio.

Just checked e-bay, you can get them for about 200 now.  (w/o DBX)

Before you buy, check the price of blank tape.  They cost me 50 to 70 bucks each when I was using the reel to reel and that's for about 40 minutes recording time per reel.
Logged

Bob Olhsson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2004, 12:04:24 PM »

I think the 38 sounds quite a bit better than an 80-8 especially without the DBX.

John Ivan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3028
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2004, 07:27:27 PM »

Bob Olhsson wrote on Sun, 05 September 2004 11:04

I think the 38 sounds quite a bit better than an 80-8 especially without the DBX.



Yeah, I'll bet this is true. The 38 used a whole new quieter electronics set and was probably more stable. I did get my 80-8 sounding quite nice after a friend went over the cards though. It was old and he recapped and built the power supply and dialed it up for 456. A friend of mine had the 38 and with the DBX, they sounded very near the same. We could not get useful results out of either 1/2" 8 track machine at 15 ips without the NR.
Logged
"Transformation is no easy trick: It's what art promises and usually doesn't deliver." Garrison Keillor

 

Scully

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2004, 10:31:02 PM »

Here is a link to some demos I did for a friends Gypsy Jazz trio on my 80-8 with no noise reduction.  http://www.ameranouche.com/wst_page2.html
Logged

Scully

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2004, 10:32:33 PM »

The live bootleg was done by someone else
Logged

John Ivan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3028
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2004, 01:42:47 PM »

Sounds nice scully;
Was this at 15 ips? When I tried this years ago, Perhaps I didn't hit the tape hard enough OR the cards were miss-dialed. Just because they dialed em, dose not mean they did it right. The recordings sound real good.
Logged
"Transformation is no easy trick: It's what art promises and usually doesn't deliver." Garrison Keillor

 

Scully

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2004, 11:38:31 PM »

Yes it was at 15ips. The 80-8 is factory calibrated for 250 tape but people put 456 on it without calibrating it for 456. Even calibrated for 456 level and pining the needles in the red with clean acoustic jazz guitars I still cant hear any noticable distortion and the hiss is almost gone, by the way the heads are so wasted on this machine you could slice cheese with the sharp edges,   Paul.
Logged

John Ivan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3028
Re: Getting that Guitar on tape sound
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2004, 03:00:00 PM »

Interesting. I'm pretty sure that it was dialed for 456 and I didn't hit the tape hard enough.My dream now is to have a 2" 16 track running at 15 ips. This would be for my own stuff. I have experienced this sound first hand and just love it. I'm maybe 6 months away from being able to buy one.

How do you folks feel about the MCI machines? I understand the Ampex MM1200 machines are wonderful things also. I keep wondering if I could pick up a Tascam MS 16 or ATR 60 cheaper and get what I'm looking for. I've used these machines also and while they sounded nice, 2",it is not.

Think Think Think.
Logged
"Transformation is no easy trick: It's what art promises and usually doesn't deliver." Garrison Keillor

 
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 19 queries.