Samc wrote on Wed, 22 December 2010 00:28 |
Paul Cavins wrote on Tue, 21 December 2010 23:39 | Heck yes!
Assange is all about gaming the system in rogue fasion to achieve his aims.
He's now being played by people using the same tactics. Eat it, you little punk!
He has the audacity to complain about his privacy being violated. Funny as hell.
|
Er...please explain "gaming the system" and while you're at it could you also tell us whose privacy he violated...
Are you in fact comfortable with governments doing everything they can to rig the system in order to put someone in jail for a crime everybody knows he didn't commit out of spite? Are you really in favor of this type of 'justice'?
|
The issue here is that Julian Assange and his lawyers never got any of the information from the prosecutor, but the same material got leaked from the legal and/or police department to the press.
The reason he never got the information, is that still to this day he has not yet been prosecuted. You can not execute an EAW without this, and in every other country you have to prosecute in order for things to proceed. Except, that is, for in Sweden.
The Geneva convention state that an accused must be read the accusations in his/her own language, and as soon as possible. This still did not happen for several months, in violation of this convention. Meanwhile, the press kept leaking information Julian Assange or his lawyers never got from the prosecutor.
The UK judge accepted the EAW because in their world there surely must exist a prosecution by now, so they were fooled by the Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny since she never said one didn't exist but also never said that it did exist.
Regardless of what Julian Assange has done or not done, this whole debacle shows a disgusting abuse of the legal system here in Sweden. I'd be pissed as well should I ever get a similar treatment.
FWIW, Wikileaks already did leak their own secret documents a long time ago. I don't think they'd hesitate leaking all legal documents from this case, should it prove to be of interest to the world. Then again, I don't think it's of much interest considering the big picture.
There is a lot more to it regarding the Swedish legal system doing shockingly wrong things with this case (and other similar cases, by the way), but I won't bore you any more at the moment.