Al
Logged
There are two kinds of fools, One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2004, 01:57:54 AM »
what do you guys use besides the Waves L2/L3/L1 units/plugins as limiters? any other close choice? Thanks again
Logged
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2004, 03:57:42 AM »
Al
Logged
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2004, 10:04:36 AM »
Alecio - I know you're familiar with the PSP stuff. I've been using the VW as my limiter with good results. Have you tried that...?
Logged
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2004, 10:42:19 AM »
Al
Logged
There are two kinds of fools, One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2004, 01:47:34 PM »
Thanks, BOB!! Jeff, Just like you, I habe been using the PSP stuff for some reasonable time. At this very moment I am using it inserted on kick and overs. I do love this plug!It really breathes! I will evaluate the limiter section more carefully and compare it to the limiter section of TC MAster X and L2. I have not been able to reach satisfatory results with the L1, so I still prefer the limiter section of the TC MAster X 5 band version.
Logged
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2004, 04:00:33 PM »
Al
Logged
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2004, 07:07:33 PM »
what about an RTAS/TDM version? Thanks
Logged
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2004, 08:34:28 PM »
Al
Logged
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2004, 11:14:30 PM »
bobkatz wrote on Wed, 25 August 2004 07:42 |
The answer of course being: "No limiter is better than any limiter"
|
What if it sounds better with the limiter in? DC
Logged
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2004, 12:28:07 AM »
defjamm wrote on Thu, 26 August 2004 01:34 |
Al
Logged
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2004, 10:40:24 AM »
dcollins wrote on Wed, 25 August 2004 23:14 |
bobkatz wrote on Wed, 25 August 2004 07:42 |
The answer of course being: "No limiter is better than any limiter"
|
What if it sounds better with the limiter in?
DC
|
Then it sounds better with the limiter in! I should rewrite my post as: If you need to "soften" transients, then a good limiter can do the job (nicely). But if for the particular recording, transient loss and depth loss sounds bad to you, then no limiter is better than any limiter!
Logged
There are two kinds of fools, One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2004, 04:59:53 AM »
Al
Logged
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2004, 07:04:29 PM »
Brad, Bob, DC do you have this box?
Logged
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2004, 07:37:48 PM »
Al
Logged
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2004, 10:00:29 PM »
Al
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|