R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 1073LB 500 series  (Read 8972 times)

wwittman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7712
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2010, 05:10:25 PM »

Fletcher wrote on Fri, 12 November 2010 11:15

...from some of the best converters to SSL desks..



in other words, the gamut from best to worst?  Twisted Evil




Why didn;t Neve call the modules in the 8078 "1073"?

why, for that matter, didn't they call the 1081 the 1073b?


at SOME point, when it's different, it's different.
it's NOT a 1073 in any meaningful way anymore and calling it that becomes simply dishonest.


It's certainly the marketing trend, but it's reprehensible.
AC30, U47, 1073, A Range... it should be what it was, and then move ON when you build something new.

or are we ADMITTING that the company, whichever it is,  has no new ideas worth selling and is just selling name recognition?

should the KM184 just be called KM84?
(just like the U87?).




Logged
William Wittman
Producer/Engineer
(Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield, Hooters...)

Bryson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2005
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2010, 03:54:43 AM »

Is it a three stage, like the 1290?
The Averill 1073MP is two stage.
Logged

Nick Sevilla

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 853
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2010, 11:23:40 AM »

Hi,

Just my 2c...

As I read this post, I remember when I spoke to Mr. Neve.

He is always trying to improve his designs. Both from a sound and a build perspective.

Now, even though he has nothing to do with this new lunchbox preamp, I do find it interesting to read a lot about the build.

In the old days, there was always a push to make things better, and less expensive to build, as well as more robust.

With this in mind, I think we should all give this device a chance, and listen to it.

I only have one reason, and this is that most component manufacturers will continue to make things smaller and cheaper to build, so the challenge for an audio manufacturer is no longer just about the build and the sound, but also about being able to service these pieces down the road.

If Neve, the company, would only use outdated components, eventually it would become itself obsolete, since eventually parts are improved, and no longer made.

I've been looking into getting some 500 series things for quite some time now.

I will try to listen first, and judge later.

Cheers
Logged
-------------------------------------------------
It is quite possible, captain, that they find us grotesque and ugly and many people fear beings different from themselves.

www.nicksevilla.com

compasspnt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16266
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2010, 05:00:27 PM »

Saw this today, thought it was funny...


index.php/fa/15846/0/

Logged

Fletcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2010, 05:36:25 PM »

wwittman wrote on Sat, 13 November 2010 17:10

Fletcher wrote on Fri, 12 November 2010 11:15

...from some of the best converters to SSL desks..



in other words, the gamut from best to worst?  Twisted Evil




Why didn;t Neve call the modules in the 8078 "1073"?

why, for that matter, didn't they call the 1081 the 1073b?


at SOME point, when it's different, it's different.
it's NOT a 1073 in any meaningful way anymore and calling it that becomes simply dishonest.


It's certainly the marketing trend, but it's reprehensible.
AC30, U47, 1073, A Range... it should be what it was, and then move ON when you build something new.

or are we ADMITTING that the company, whichever it is,  has no new ideas worth selling and is just selling name recognition?

should the KM184 just be called KM84?
(just like the U87?).


Confused

Because none of it was ever supposed to be "vintage" - there was never supposed to be this quest for nostalgia that in some cases is warranted, and in most cases is not.

They should have seen the beginnings when a 1958 "Gold Top" Les Paul started going for $2000- in the early 70's [which was a shit load of money then - you could buy a new "Camaro" for like $3000  -- but nothing like the unbelievably obscene money they go for now days] -- but no one could have expected the current "junior league revolution".

I remember Neve 1073 modules at $1000- each being the top end of expensive in 1990... a 350-400% "return on investment" in 20 years?  I wish I held onto some of those fuckers - I'd be swimming in cash right about now!!!

They were worth a grandish about then - and with current economics - maybe $2000 - $2250 now - but not a lot more.  With the current build technology available, if they went to a "non - union" labor country for the build, chances are they could be shipping them for $1500 per unit [original "redux" modules] - but what fun would that be?

As for the "new" 500 version - I'll wait to pass judgement until I've worked with them extensively - but at the end of the day - the Great River MP-500nv does a great job at what I would consider a reasonable price -- and that module works from the perspective of "if the design process had continued - where would it have ended up now?  -- which is always an interesting question to ask.

Peace.
Logged
CN Fletcher

mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid


"Recording engineers are an arrogant bunch.  
If you've spent most of your life with a few thousand dollars worth of musicians in the studio, making a decision every second and a half... and you and  they are going to have to live with it for the rest of your lives, you'll get pretty arrogant too.  It takes a certain amount of balls to do that... something around three"
Malcolm Chisholm

wwittman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7712
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2010, 11:30:23 AM »

did i mention i sold my 670 for $1000 in about 1980?


Logged
William Wittman
Producer/Engineer
(Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield, Hooters...)

kats

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1694
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2010, 12:30:07 PM »

Did you do anything good with the $1k?
Logged
Tony K.
http://empirerecording.ca

Entertainment is a bore, communication is where it's at! - Brian Jones 1967

compasspnt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16266
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2010, 02:12:28 PM »

And I am still enjoying it...
Logged

thedoc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1218
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #23 on: November 16, 2010, 11:34:19 AM »

MI said...

"However there are better solutions...
Brent Averill, Daking, API...

and then also said..."It's probably a great preamp in it's own right, and I would love to hear it."

I just have to ask, how do you know there are better solutions if you have never heard the unit in question?

Just think of all the time I could save if I don't have to bother hearing something before deciding which is best...
Logged
Doc

MI

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1292
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #24 on: November 16, 2010, 12:02:38 PM »

Hello Doc,

I was referring to needing the "NEVE 1073" name per say.
This unit is not a 1073 IMHO in the traditional sense.
For me a 1073 has an EQ in it.

If one NEEDS a 1073, buy an real 1073 reissue, with EQ.

If you ask me for a good high end preamp without EQ,
I'd much rather buy a Daking or BAE.

I apologize,  I should have said "I would much rather stick to what I have used"

Kinda like buying an Audi A3. It looks like and Audi, only smaller.
For the same money I would buy a VW.

So if one MUST have a piece of gear that says Neve, by all means buy it.
It's a free world.

Mario


Logged

MI

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1292
Re: 1073LB 500 series
« Reply #25 on: November 16, 2010, 12:09:01 PM »

Fletcher wrote on Sun, 14 November 2010 17:36



I remember Neve 1073 modules at $1000- each being the top end of expensive in 1990... a 350-400% "return on investment" in 20 years?  I wish I held onto some of those fuckers - I'd be swimming in cash right about now!!!

They were worth a grandish about then - and with current economics - maybe $2000 - $2250 now - but not a lot more.  With the current build technology available, if they went to a "non - union" labor country for the build, chances are they could be shipping them for $1500 per unit [original "redux" modules] - but what fun would that be?

As for the "new" 500 version - I'll wait to pass judgement until I've worked with them extensively - but at the end of the day - the Great River MP-500nv does a great job at what I would consider a reasonable price -- and that module works from the perspective of "if the design process had continued - where would it have ended up now?  -- which is always an interesting question to ask.

Peace.


I remember an 8014 16 channel 1073 with 2x2254's I had used in a studio being sold for 30ish thousand in the mid 90's.

The same console is today being advertised for over 80,000$.

Ok it used to have issues, and supposedly been given the once over...

MI

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 19 queries.