dcollins wrote on Sat, 09 January 2010 15:11 |
Why does it matter? It's just a made-up term, like all audiophile adjectives. Scintillating, palpable, robust, ginormous -- all meaningless and subject to interpretation by each listener.
How would an "official definition" make the slightest bit of difference?
DC
|
+1
but (and since I was asked by Thomas on gearslutz)this is my view on the use of the above term :
As far as I am concerned most of the answers given to Thomas, were spot on.
I also would like to agree, that the use of the term would be beneficial, mainly in discussions between engineers .
According to the greek language (I need to inform you that both words "micro" and "dynamics" are greek words) the word micro-dynamic is not 100% correct, for the context that most of you here are giving to it.(same goes for the word macro-dynamics)
So in a more correct manner, I would use the terms "dynamics over the microscopic view" or "dynamics over the macroscopic view"
Now since I am not a language teacher I might be wrong ...
...having said that I use the informal term (micro dynamics) since it is easier and I will continue using it when speaking with non greek speaking clients.(In greek I still use the term "dynamics over the microscopic view", since the other term doesnt sound natural)