Nika Aldrich wrote on Wed, 23 June 2004 14:56 |
As of yet I think just about everyone in the thread agrees that transducers are IIR filters and that FIR filters can only exist in the world of mathematics except for Zoesch.
|
Do me one favor and don't misquote me:
1)I have never said that FIR filters exist in the real world, they are only valid mathematically
2)I am challenging not the mathematical approximation of transducers
IN A FEEDBACK CONFIGURATION to be IIR filters, I am challenging the blind belief of the "physics impaired" that a)equilibrium does not exist, b)that equilibrium means absolute zero, c)that inferred behavior is the same as observed behavior and e)That the model is equivalent to the simplified model.
3)BTW, so far, I haven't seen you come and describe how a force of 1 mN can move a 20 gram paper cone @ 1 p.a.
Of course, this would've been simplified if we had stuck to the part of the impulse response where you incorrectly assume that the system is still oscillating beyond measurable parameters (Seriously, I want to see that theory supported on say the potential barrier between Boron and Silicon Oxide) and I am stating that the response is constant and unmesurable.
Maybe you have never spent any time behind measurement equipment, I don't know your background and I won't assume either way.
To me, unsurprisingly this all comes from the standpoint of mathematic "correctness" which is a dangerous position to take, specially considering the tag team you seem to be forming here.
As I don't know what you two are about maybe you want to step down from the spin machine soapbox and display a behavior more fit to the forum's intent and forms and the discussion at hand.