Paul Cavins wrote on Fri, 29 August 2008 17:17 |
I want someone to tell me why Barrack Obama has more experience to be president than Sarah Palin.
|
Well, let's just start with the experience of going from being an underpriviledged kid to being the head of Harvard Law Review.
Also, when asked about her opinions on the Iraq war, she said, "I haven't really put much thought into it."
Maybe she knows how to run the state of Alaska (so far), but he clearly has a better command of not only foreign policy. He's been on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee as well as the committee for Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs.
When he was a state senator, there he represented more people in his district than there are in the state of Alaska.
He managed to run a campaign that vanquished the seemingly unbeatable Hillary Clinton, and got more votes in a primary than any other candidate in primary history.
She was runner up to being Ms. Alaska, was part time mayor of a town of less than 10,000 and has 18 months under her belt as governor of the 4 least populous state in the nation. Hey, if Ahnuld can be governor or California, I don;t know that being governor for a short period really impresses me that much. It's a long way from Juneau to Washington.
Does that answer your question?
This is pretty good, too. Yeah, they are biased, but if it's what it looks like, he McLazarus might have an Agnew on his hands.
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/29/palin-corruption-investi gation/