bblackwood wrote |
ssltech wrote |
bblackwood wrote on Sun, 17 August 2008 09:09 | American football will never - NEVER - be as popular as the rest of common sports as it requires too much money to participate, plain and simple.
|
Formula One.
|
Even fewer participate in F1 racing than play football.
|
That's irrelevant, surely? Your comment linked expense with lack of popularity; number of participants has nothing to do with anything.
Formula 1 is VASTLY more expensive than football, yet is followed all over the globe. The TV audience for live Formula 1 races is right up there with the world cup for Soccer.
-And good Soccer players teams -I'm almost certain- cost a lot more to populate than Football teams. Real Madrid just spent $130,000,000 just to secure the services of a single player... and that's before they even BEGIN paying his approx. twenty-million-dollar-per-annum salary. -That's ONE PLAYER.
Now I don't follow American 'football' because I can't abide the interminable stop-start 'ten-seconds of scrambled-activity-followed-by-ten-minutes-of-committee-meet ings' interrupted play. It seems that most US 'sports' have to RUIN the flow by some means or other... "Time-outs" in Football, Basketball, Hockey etc. and "yellow-flag laps" in their motorsports. It makes for convenient insertion of commercial adverts, but for the love of Pete... If you have to pay 'brains-swapped-for-boobs' blondes to wear revealing outfits, dance, smile incessantly and do back-flips while waving shiny glittery bits of tinsel, if you have to give away Tee-Shirts fired from a cannon, if you have to pay some fool to dress up in a silly 'mascot' costume all in the name of just to keep the crowd amused and entertained... Here's a newsflash... the game isn't very interesting.
There's none of that at a Soccer match (for example), and yet the crowd WORSHIPS the game.
American 'football' is simply
not a very good game. -THAT is why the rest of the world really doesn't care.
It's just tedious, -sorry.
Keith