R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30]   Go Down

Author Topic: when an artist needs a producer  (Read 58080 times)

jimmyjazz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1885
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #435 on: August 08, 2008, 10:07:26 AM »

For me, that's an interesting comparison because I don't own "Flick of the Switch" and probably haven't heard many of the songs.

Bedlam In Belgium   The main rhythm track is out of tune, the band is pushing and pulling, and the sounds are on the "small" side.  Disregarding Mutt Lange's tendency to lead bands into harmonies they might not have created on their own, etc., I'm pretty confident that he would have caught the basic problems with the track and never let them get out of the studio.

Guns For Hire   Similar tuning issues, similar small sounds.  Band seems a bit tighter.  Sounds like a demo.

Nervous Shakedown   Better drum sounds and performance.  Closer to "Back In Black" than the other two, but still not in the same league.


Seems to me that AC/DC "needs" (or benefits from) a producer. or at least Mutt Lange's production.  Or . . . ???

Logged

J.J. Blair

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12809
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #436 on: August 08, 2008, 11:53:46 AM »

wwittman wrote on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:32

if it feels at all like "work" you're in the wrong marriage.


Oh, man.  Did you have to go there?
Logged
studio info

They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.

"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher

"The negative aspects of this business, not only will continue to prevail, but will continue to accelerate in madness. Conditions aren't going to get better, because the economics of rock and roll are getting closer and closer to the economics of Big Business America." - Bill Graham

Chris Ilett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #437 on: August 08, 2008, 12:42:22 PM »

trock wrote on Thu, 07 August 2008 21:46


oh and i just remembered this, about 1:04 second into "Nervous shakedown" they re use a riff right out of back in black, would a great producer have let that happen?? were they out of ideas where a fresh outlook would have helped??





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FULmRElO1yk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slh1hlx-nno

jimmyjazz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1885
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #438 on: August 08, 2008, 01:20:34 PM »

Aw, he's not really ripping himself off.  The first one's in C, the second one's in G!

Very Happy
Logged

Fibes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4306
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #439 on: August 08, 2008, 01:26:07 PM »

J.J. Blair wrote on Fri, 08 August 2008 11:53

wwittman wrote on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:32

if it feels at all like "work" you're in the wrong marriage.


Oh, man.  Did you have to go there?


I'm curious as to how this exchange couold turn into one as nerdy as the Flanger thread.


Logged
Fibes
-------------------------------------------------
"You can like it, or not like it."
The Studio

  http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewArtist ?id=155759887
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse2

wwittman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7712
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #440 on: August 08, 2008, 01:46:21 PM »

give it time.
(or time based effects)
Logged
William Wittman
Producer/Engineer
(Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield, Hooters...)

RSettee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6796
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #441 on: August 08, 2008, 06:50:49 PM »

trock wrote on Thu, 07 August 2008 21:46

sorta back on topic

i was thinking about this and all the opinions posted here.

so i did some digging....and listening

I took Back in Black and listened to a bunch of the tunes again. then pulled out Flick of the switch

now i found this somewhat interesting because they were both recorded at the same place, i would guess in the same rooms and console?? and gear?? they were recorded about 2 years apart. Brians voice still great

everyone knows back in black, but i was interested to re listen to flick

flick was self produced by AC/DC, and i think tony platt engineered this one as well as back in black, so we have ALOT of the same components going

one other thing thats important is of course the songs themselves. i truly think Flick had some great songs, or possibilites of songs.

while listening to some of the better tracks on Flick i couldn't help but wonder what Mutt would have done with them? certainly the overall sound would have been better, and i think some changes would have happened that would have possibly made this another great and huge album....if only

i don't know...but i think this is a good example of a great band, one album with a great producer and then the same band, same studio, same engineer, self producing....very different

couple examples, these 2 songs to me are stellar ac/dc songs, but there is something missing, something that didn't take them to the level i really wanted to hear them at. i bought this album as soon as it came out and my opinion was the same then as it is tonight

what could mutt have done at compass point with these tracks?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhhk80u0HH8&feature=relat ed

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMfeKHH_YHs&feature=relat ed

etc

oh and i just remembered this, about 1:04 second into "Nervous shakedown" they re use a riff right out of back in black, would a great producer have let that happen?? were they out of ideas where a fresh outlook would have helped??

the mystery deepens

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvkuM_a1seA&feature=relat ed




A much better comparison is "Back In Black" vs "For Those About To Rock"....important to realize is that "For Those About To Rock", as a followup, is much overshadowed by "Back In Black", and Mutt Lange did both.
Logged

Chris Ilett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #442 on: August 08, 2008, 08:09:20 PM »

He's got hits left in him yet. There's stil E and A to go, then time for something new.

Apart from a bit too much bland, I have nothing against Bryan Adams. Good artist.

Anyone here worked with Jim Vallance?

jimmyjazz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1885
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #443 on: August 09, 2008, 01:19:36 AM »

Then that's not a very good comparison of "with" vs. "without" a producer, is it?  (Though it might be a good control for such a comparison.)
Logged

Chris Ilett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
Re: when an artist needs a producer
« Reply #444 on: August 09, 2008, 05:40:57 AM »

Sorry Your Honour.
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30]   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.089 seconds with 21 queries.