Over the years, a lot of us have done "spec" projects - we believe in the talent, we see potential, we expect to get paid at some point, or whatever entices us to do the job without money actually changing hands. I just commited to doing another "spec" job; two brothers that are great songwriters and players.
To make matters worse, it's gonna be a Christian album, and we'll use the proceeds from that album to fund their rock album - the real goal. When I say worse, most "religeous albums" I've done on "spec" have been disappointing at best, and recording nightmares at worst. None have ever been worth the time wasted or the money received.
So this has me musing about why I do "spec" jobs at all, what usually goes wrong, and why should I ever consider doing it again?
Usually, "spec" jobs fail because we believe in the talent more than the talent believes in themselves. Once they're in the studio, their enthusiasm diminishes quickly when they start flubbing it and no amount of reassuance can restore their wounded ego.
Another case is where they really are great, but as far as they're concerned, you should be honored to record them and they owe you nothing beyond that.
Finally, since they feel they have nothing really invested in the process, they sometimes don't appreciate the time or cost you want to recover, and they're happy with a couple of CRDs to hand out to friends and family.
It bothers me when I see someone with real talent and they're wasting it. It bothers me when they're not willing to try to make it. It bothers me when they don't appreciate what you've done, or worse, when they badmouth you. (Yes, I've had that happen a couple of times.)
But still, I do stuff on "spec" from time to time. Is it "pro bono" or am I just a machochist?