"There will be a moment when I won't be able to continue working," Mr. Mart
Logged
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2008, 12:07:05 AM »
J-Texas wrote on Sun, 30 March 2008 23:41 |
Quote: |
"There will be a moment when I won't be able to continue working," Mr. Mart
Logged
regards,
YZ
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2008, 12:26:43 AM »
YZ wrote on Sun, 30 March 2008 23:07 |
J-Texas wrote on Sun, 30 March 2008 23:41 |
Quote: |
"There will be a moment when I won't be able to continue working," Mr. Mart
Logged
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2008, 01:07:57 AM »
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 01:26 |
I'm sure the family back home has a few pesos en el banco from the extra hundred dollars you're sending home each week that the US economy will never see again.
|
Let me try to understand your point of view. You mean that money earned in the U.S. of A. should only be spent in goods and services which consist exclusively of 100% U.S. of A.- originated source materials, intellectual property and/or work? Is that right? Well... Do you realize that you've sent money abroad when you bought your iphone? That your car, no matter what brand, has components from many countries, including engineering, design and others? And that most of the electronic components inside any appliance, no matter what the "Made In ___" sticker says, are made in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan, China...
Logged
regards,
YZ
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2008, 09:59:56 AM »
YZ wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 00:07 |
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 01:26 |
I'm sure the family back home has a few pesos en el banco from the extra hundred dollars you're sending home each week that the US economy will never see again.
|
Let me try to understand your point of view.
You mean that money earned in the U.S. of A. should only be spent in goods and services which consist exclusively of 100% U.S. of A.- originated source materials, intellectual property and/or work?
Is that right?
Well...
Do you realize that you've sent money abroad when you bought your iphone?
That your car, no matter what brand, has components from many countries, including engineering, design and others?
And that most of the electronic components inside any appliance, no matter what the "Made In ___" sticker says, are made in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan, China...
|
No dude. That's the obvious rebuttal to that, I understand. When I pay for my iPhone... guess what? I get an iPhone. I get nothing (and neither does anyone else in the US of A) from somebody working here, (taxed deferred and without any monetary contribution to the services offered to him) taking money out of the economy. It's a drain. At least if he bought something from China out of a store... it would help the store stay in business. Do you not even remotely see what I'm saying? edit-type-o
Logged
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2008, 10:57:12 AM »
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 10:59 |
No dude. That's the obvious rebuttal to that, I understand. When I pay for my iPhone... guess what? I get an iPhone. I get nothing (and neither does anyone else in the US of A) from somebody working here, (taxed deferred and without any monetary contribution to the services offered to him) taking money out of the economy. It's a drain. At least if he bought something from China out of a store... it would help the store stay in business. Do you not even remotely see what I'm saying?
edit-type-o
|
Ok, if I understood well, after you pay for the goods/services in your country, it does not matter what happens with the money thereafter. You pay (example) $400 for a China-made gadget, $100 goes to the store, $150 goes to the manufacturer+distributor chain, $50 goes to taxes and $100 goes to China and that's good. (the breakdown may be way off but its just an example). You paid for a hamburger, got the hamburger, the end. No problem. Right?
Logged
regards,
YZ
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2008, 11:07:37 AM »
YZ wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 09:57 |
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 10:59 |
No dude. That's the obvious rebuttal to that, I understand. When I pay for my iPhone... guess what? I get an iPhone. I get nothing (and neither does anyone else in the US of A) from somebody working here, (taxed deferred and without any monetary contribution to the services offered to him) taking money out of the economy. It's a drain. At least if he bought something from China out of a store... it would help the store stay in business. Do you not even remotely see what I'm saying?
edit-type-o
|
Ok, if I understood well, after you pay for the goods/services in your country, it does not matter what happens with the money thereafter.
You pay (example) $400 for a China-made gadget, $100 goes to the store, $150 goes to the manufacturer+distributor chain, $50 goes to taxes and $100 goes to China and that's good. (the breakdown may be way off but its just an example).
You paid for a hamburger, got the hamburger, the end.
No problem.
Right?
|
I paid for the hamburger. Helped out the US owned store and got full. Yes. I helped out the owner of the store so he's one more product further away from closing down, contributed to the sales tax to help supplement the cost of doing business in Texas so that I CAN go to the store and buy something, AND I got my Chinese gadget. The Chinese made some money too. GREAT. Now how does that compare to somebody here illegally taking tax-free money out of the economy? How many more times should we do this (you and I)?
Logged
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2008, 11:26:27 AM »
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 12:07 |
I paid for the hamburger. Helped out the US owned store and got full.
Yes. I helped out the owner of the store so he's one more product further away from closing down, contributed to the sales tax to help supplement the cost of doing business in Texas so that I CAN go to the store and buy something, AND I got my Chinese gadget. The Chinese made some money too. GREAT.
Now how does that compare to somebody here illegally taking tax-free money out of the economy?
How many more times should we do this (you and I)?
|
So you paid for the gadget $400 and no problem if $100 goes to China because of all the positive things that you stated above. End of story. That's fine with me too. Remember that when you paid $400 for the gadget, from which $100 went to China and it did not matter to you, some $0.25 went to pay the salary of the immigrant who sweeps the floor at the store's warehouse. Who might be sending some $0.05 from that to his family in Honduras, what's left after he pays his rent, his food, his clothing, transportation, Social Security, taxes (yes!) and every other expense he incurs in your country. But you have a beef with those $0.05 from your $400.00 from which $100 can go to China but somehow the $100.00 is OK with you and the $0.05 is not. Do you see my point now?
Logged
regards,
YZ
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2008, 11:47:23 AM »
YZ wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 10:26 |
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 12:07 |
I paid for the hamburger. Helped out the US owned store and got full.
Yes. I helped out the owner of the store so he's one more product further away from closing down, contributed to the sales tax to help supplement the cost of doing business in Texas so that I CAN go to the store and buy something, AND I got my Chinese gadget. The Chinese made some money too. GREAT.
Now how does that compare to somebody here illegally taking tax-free money out of the economy?
How many more times should we do this (you and I)?
|
So you paid for the gadget $400 and no problem if $100 goes to China because of all the positive things that you stated above.
End of story.
That's fine with me too.
Remember that when you paid $400 for the gadget, from which $100 went to China and it did not matter to you, some $0.25 went to pay the salary of the immigrant who sweeps the floor at the store's warehouse.
Who might be sending some $0.05 from that to his family in Honduras, what's left after he pays his rent, his food, his clothing, transportation, Social Security, taxes (yes!) and every other expense he incurs in your country.
But you have a beef with those $0.05 from your $400.00 from which $100 can go to China but somehow the $100.00 is OK with you and the $0.05 is not.
Do you see my point now?
|
Are you joking? NOBODY and I mean NOBODY is going to pay for, as you said, rent, his food, his clothing, transportation, Social Security, taxes and every other expense he incurs in my country for .25 cents an hour. I only wish that I got .25 on every product sold in a store on any given day. Either way, I have no idea where you are getting this from.
Logged
« Reply #42 on: March 31, 2008, 01:21:51 PM »
J-Texas wrote on Mon, 31 March 2008 12:47 |
Are you joking? NOBODY and I mean NOBODY is going to pay for, as you said, rent, his food, his clothing, transportation, Social Security, taxes and every other expense he incurs in my country for .25 cents an hour. I only wish that I got .25 on every product sold in a store on any given day. Either way, I have no idea where you are getting this from.
|
I'm not saying that Jos
Logged
regards,
YZ
« Reply #43 on: March 31, 2008, 01:48:26 PM »
J- maybe i missed something but it seems your opposition is based on taxes.
so, if the IRS was eliminated what would the problem be?
Logged
« Reply #44 on: March 31, 2008, 02:04:15 PM »
Notice how everyone who listens to Rebublican mouthpiece, shrieking-midget hissy-fit talk radio hosts uses the word "illegals"?
...Just an observation...
Keith
Logged
MDM (maxdimario) wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 21:36 | I have the feeling that I have more experience in my little finger than you do in your whole body about audio electronics..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|