R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: IMP16 discussion  (Read 22919 times)

mcsnare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 958
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2008, 03:11:45 pm »

What's so hard to change about putting it up at 256? I'll put mine up at that rate.
Dave

audio~geek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2008, 04:32:54 pm »

Why not 320? I did that last time an no one cared except ChrisJ who wouldn't even listen, the big meanie  Sad

Even better would be FLAC, be done with lossy formats forever.

Careful Collapse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 321
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2008, 08:35:52 pm »

I like the idea of FLAC too but mp3 is a lot more universal
Logged
Billy V
I have my very own space on the nets http://www.myspace.com/carefulcollapse

Boedo Constrictor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2008, 10:36:54 pm »

Hola I have raised my mix newly, for this occasion I imposed a deadline of 3 hours, I have not managed to automate anything but I believe that it works well. In spite of the topic not being recorded of happy way, the tune is very good and is mixed easily.
Mixed in Protools 7.3 only with Sony MDR7506 (like always)
I did not replace the kick, only compression and a bit of eq of the plugins Waves API.
I replaced the SN by one of my own ones samples.
I tuned to the toms
Compression in the Ambient.
I simulated an amp of bass with the DI channel
I used the guitars and voices.
Some delays hereabouts a reverb there.
I list!
Logged

garret

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1012
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #34 on: January 20, 2008, 11:10:09 pm »

I was fine with 192kbps... 256kbps is okay too, but um, bigger.

Anything above that seems like overkill for our purposes, and wastes PSW bandwidth.

Downloading one 10MB mp3 is no big deal, but we have had 30 entries before... if my math is correct, that's 9GB of bandwidth if everyone uploads to the PSW server, and downloads every entry...

FLAC would be huge... 5 times the size of 192kbps mp3.

Logged
tomorrow is already here - http://www.worksongs.net/

audio~geek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #35 on: January 21, 2008, 01:02:20 am »

garret wrote on Sun, 20 January 2008 22:10

I was fine with 192kbps... 256kbps is okay too, but um, bigger.

Anything above that seems like overkill for our purposes, and wastes PSW bandwidth.

Downloading one 10MB mp3 is no big deal, but we have had 30 entries before... if my math is correct, that's 9GB of bandwidth if everyone uploads to the PSW server, and downloads every entry...

FLAC would be huge... 5 times the size of 192kbps mp3.



thats a good point.

osumosan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
IMP Goof!
« Reply #36 on: January 21, 2008, 09:47:47 am »

Please ignore IMP_Osumosan.mp3!

I can't even listen to the song now since I mixed at 44.1K for a week.

Sheesh!
Logged

Podgorny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1491
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #37 on: January 21, 2008, 10:37:42 am »

osumosan wrote on Mon, 21 January 2008 08:47

I can't even listen to the song now since I mixed at 44.1K for a week.

Sheesh!



I don't get it.





Logged
"Nobody cares what the impedance is; all they care about is when you can walk into the room, set up a mic, turn the knobs, hit record, and make everybody go 'wow.'"

Podgorny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1491
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #38 on: January 21, 2008, 10:42:17 am »

Hahaha.

I just listened to it.
I understand now.

Can't you just import the file into a session without SRC, and then re-export it?





Logged
"Nobody cares what the impedance is; all they care about is when you can walk into the room, set up a mic, turn the knobs, hit record, and make everybody go 'wow.'"

UnderTow

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 393
Re: IMP16 discussion
« Reply #39 on: January 21, 2008, 11:52:37 am »


I did a quick mix but my brain just isn't functioning. I won't upload it as I don't feel it is good enough.

But I'm looking forward to hearing all the entries. Smile

Alistair
Logged

audio~geek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2008, 12:07:31 pm »

Podgorny wrote on Mon, 21 January 2008 09:42

Hahaha.

I just listened to it.
I understand now.

Can't you just import the file into a session without SRC, and then re-export it?


Wouldn't the automation be in the wrong places then. The files would be a different length.

Its kind of funny how this happens almost every time, some 'engineer' doesn't check the files before importing, or doesn't notice until after he finishes a mix.
Sometimes we just don't listen do we.

Podgorny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1491
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #41 on: January 21, 2008, 12:15:28 pm »

Audio~Geek wrote on Mon, 21 January 2008 11:07

Wouldn't the automation be in the wrong places then. The files would be a different length.



I meant the mix, not the source files.





Logged
"Nobody cares what the impedance is; all they care about is when you can walk into the room, set up a mic, turn the knobs, hit record, and make everybody go 'wow.'"

audio~geek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #42 on: January 21, 2008, 12:41:57 pm »

I kind of like the slowed down version  Smile

osumosan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #43 on: January 21, 2008, 01:40:55 pm »

More of a case of not reading and having generally a static work flow. Hopefully, this is my lesson learned.

Anyway. Yes all the automations, edits, would have to be redone. I couldn't do it today, and it would be NO fun. I could resample the speed, but I wouldn't want to submit that blindly either. Too late in any case. Hope you all enjoy it anyway, although I asked J. to take down the file in embarassment.
Logged

audio~geek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
Re: IMP Goof!
« Reply #44 on: January 21, 2008, 01:46:42 pm »

osumosan wrote on Mon, 21 January 2008 12:40

More of a case of not reading and having generally a static work flow. Hopefully, this is my lesson learned.

Anyway. Yes all the automations, edits, would have to be redone. I couldn't do it today, and it would be NO fun. I could resample the speed, but I wouldn't want to submit that blindly either. Too late in any case. Hope you all enjoy it anyway, although I asked J. to take down the file in embarassment.

Nah man, that version rocks! Just speed it up so its the correct tempo, but keep it low.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13   Go Up