Wump is like the blind leading the blind unless we get someone with great references and that can be considered an industry standard to participate.
Otherwise, there isn't much learning happening.
If it's only a contest, then it's kind of pointless to me.
It would be great to have one of the big-timers that hang out here to take 15 minutes and show us how they would have done it proper. It would be much more illustrative.
Don't get me wrong, I think in general we do a pretty decent job, but how are we going to know if it couldn't have been done better unless someone who's a real master at this gives it a shot.
I think wump needs to be fixed in many ways, most importantly we need a mentor.
This subjective judging of each other through uncoordinated monitoring environments doesn't help either.
It would be much more clear and to the point if we could just HEAR what a "real" pro could have done with a given mix, even if it's just a one minute sample. That way it might be easier to gauge everything because there will be somewhat of a definitive touchstone that hasn't been abstracted so much by our very own words.
People can spend 5 pages describing what something sounded like or what it should sound like, but if we could just press play it would be illuminated in 5 seconds, not a word need be spoken thereafter, except in the relaying of facts and actual comparisons..