R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MXL 603s...yowsa.  (Read 4689 times)

sstillwell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
MXL 603s...yowsa.
« on: April 25, 2004, 01:31:54 am »

I got a real chance to try out the MXL 603s that I bought a while back.

I won a bid to record a local community symphony orchestra (I also wound up providing sound and lights on short notice, but that's another story...).

Here's the setup:

1 X-Y pair of Shure SM81 for reinforcement (for the sides of the room...audience was nearly "in the round").

1 X-Y pair of MXL 603S

1 Audio Technica boundary mic (don't know the model#) mounted on 18" square of plexiglas.

The X-Y pairs were both on a QuikLok studio boom, on the audience floor 3' below the stage, left-right positioned just stage right of the podium (towards the first violin section), tilted down to aim just past/behind the first row of musicians.

The AT boundary mic was at the back of the room behind the audience...for ambience more than anything.

The room was 80' X 160', with the orchestra situated along the center of the long wall, aimed across the short dimension of the room.  The room used to be a show horse arena, and has concrete floors, but wood walls and roof.  When empty, the place is a reverberant hell.  There were approximately 1100 people at the concert (sold out show), and the orchestra is approximately 90 pieces.

Mics went down a plain-vanilla Whirlwind Medusa snake to a Soundcraft Spirit LX7-24 board.  The SM81s were the only thing live to the mains, but I took all five mics from the direct outs on the channels to my DAW.

Intel D875PBZ board
P4 2.8GHz/800FSB
1GB DDR400 dual-channel RAM
Delta 1010
Vegas 4

Recording was done at 48/24, and levels never exceeded -25dB on any channel on the 1010.

Mixing mostly consisted of setting a relative level for the mics and applying a teensy bit of EQ and compression (UAD-1 Pultec and Fairchild, respectively).  I then used a dedicated mastering EQ program "Har-Bal" to do the final tweaks to EQ. Pulled the results into Sound Forge to maximize levels, burn it to CD in Vegas, and we're done.

Now, I know I wasn't using DPA or Schoeps mics into Millennia preamps, but I thought it turned out at least okay...maybe even better.

Now, I go through all of this for two reasons...

A) to tell you that I LOVE the sound of those 603s for symphony.  The SM81s just sounded...flat, dull, sterile...I dunno how else to describe it.  The MXLs sounded warm and alive.  Specs say that they have a peak at around 10k...but it was the warmth that I noticed.

B) to have you guys tell me what you think of the end product.  I rendered an MP3 at 160kbps for about 1:30 (which is about all that will fit in the 2MB upload allowance).

Regards,

Scott Stillwell

PS:  I like the new place, Harvey!
Logged

sstillwell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2004, 01:53:59 am »

Sorry, I just noticed that I phrased part of that badly.

The stage was raised 3' above the floor of the arena, the mic stand was on the floor of the arena, extended full length, so that the mics were at a height about 6' above the conductor's head, but were actually somewhere to the left of his left shoulder.

Hope that's more clear.

Scott
Logged

hargerst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1458
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2004, 08:58:46 am »

Wow, Scott, great job of recording. Pretty amazing for $150 worth of microphones, isn't it?
Logged
Harvey "Is that the right note?" Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio

sstillwell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2004, 12:12:45 pm »

You betcha!  Very Happy

Thank you, Harvey.  I read as much as I could when I was selecting SD condenser mics (no real local source for borrowing/renting them...music stores have been dropping like flies around here, including one that I spent 15 years building a relationship with), and was agonizing over spending what I really couldn't afford at the moment for a matched pair of MC012 from The Sound Room...decided that I really COULDN'T afford them at the moment, and took comfort from your opinions of the 603S.  I'll still probably get the MC012s later.  Along with Lord knows what else.  

The next thing I want to try for this type of recording is a M-S setup, or a modified M-S setup proposed by some of the folks that do live recording for PBS.  One M-S setup facing forward at a reasonable audience distance, one M-S setup (or was it cardioid?) facing backwards into the audience, just at the boundary of direct & reverberant field.  Mix to taste.

Maybe I'll try out the Studio Projects LSD2...or a couple of them...

Gahh...GAS is a terrible thing.  (to self) Remember, Scott, cheap WORKS.

Smile

Scott Stillwell
Logged

floodstage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 543
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2004, 01:46:09 pm »

The 603 is pretty nice on acoustic guitar as well.
Logged

Greg Youngman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 609
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2004, 02:15:06 pm »

Scott.

Your recording even sounded good on the crappy little spaekers on my internet machine.  I transfered the mp3 into the studio and it sounds very nice.  Good job!  Also, you're fortunate to have some good community players.

I'm wondering how much time you had for mic setup/listening before hitting record?

TNX
Logged
Web Site
My Space
Blog

"Everyone's a guitar player... everyone's a mastering engineer." 1995 - GY

sstillwell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2004, 07:02:35 pm »

Hmmm...

Well, We had about a day and a half to set up everything...PA, lights, recording.

We had approximately 10 minutes to soundcheck and get levels before we had to clear stage before the concert.

Soundcheck supposedly was at 7:00, seating at 7:30, concert at 8:00.  It was more like 7:15, 7:20, 8:05...nothing ever follows schedule.

I'm glad you liked the players; I'm one of them!  Not a very good one, but I play second violin.  Actually my first instrument, but I've been playing bass guitar for most of the past 20 years.  When I heard the orchestra was forming, I got out the violin and started practicing like mad for a month or so before auditions.  I guess it worked  Laughing

Regards,

Scott Stillwell
Logged

Han S.

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 205
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2004, 07:32:10 am »

Scott, you did a remarkable job, it sounds really good on my computer speakers (Altec Lansing).

If I'm right the 603's are 'wide' cardioids, therefore I would like to place them on an ORTF placement, which would give you an even more realistic stereo image.

In any case, I'm gonna get a pair of them 603's.
Logged

sstillwell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2004, 12:16:29 pm »

Yes, it's also my understanding that the 603S are wide cardioid.  Probably accounts for some of the lack of definition in the imaging.  Well, that and the XY...

I thought about using ORTF, but my thought was that XY would be more mono-compatible.  I haven't used ORTF before, though I've read about it quite a bit.  I generally feel more comfortable with coincident techniques rather than near-coincident for minimalist recordings.

Given that I had next to zero time to set up mic positioning for the orchestra, I also felt that XY was the safer choice, since it's almost impossible to get XY badly wrong.  As long as the mics are in the ballpark of the right location, you should get a mostly ok recording.  At least that was the logic I was going by...flawed or not.

I think I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but what I REALLY would have liked to try was MS recording, but I didn't have the mic setup for it.

Scott
Logged

seriousfun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 329
Re: MXL 603s...yowsa.
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2004, 03:37:38 pm »

Just finished using a pair of 603s recording Asian percussion - Taiko drums, etc. - for a very dynamic video game orchestral composition. Martech MSS-10s were the preamps.

They stood up very well next to the classic, expensive, brand-name mics. They fit in the mix. They presented to barrier to the musicians thinking they were stuck with cheap mics.

Highly recommended.
Logged
doug osborne | my day job
Pages: [1]   Go Up