| jfrigo wrote on Fri, 08 June 2007 10:56 |
You can loop out to external processors with sB, though I've never tried it personally. I prefer a more traditional workflow where I process on load-in, and I have a variety of source machines, anaog and digital, and when things come in as data files, a second DAW (a pro tools rig) serves as the source format (it can run in the same computer if you wish). I like this flow better, though I could just as easily have my source files in the same sB project as the processed fles. Some people like that workflow better.
|
That's my current workflow in PT, loop out to analog processors, back into DAW at the native sampling rate, if needed SR convert after the fact.
I'd like verification that SB can do the Loop flawlessly (por favor). | jdg wrote on Fri, 08 June 2007 11:33 |
would be cool if it let you use two audio interfaces at different rates tho, but they use core audio... and i dont think thats possible (yet)
|
Agreed, I don't see that happening soon, not enough demand, except for us geeky MEs.
| Andy Krehm wrote on Fri, 08 June 2007 11:33 |
My current system, where I usually SRC after processing works just fine but always sounds slightly different than how I remember it sounding at the native resolution
|
Yes it sounds a little different, but so do the bit reduced, dithered files when going from 24 to 16 with WB -or- PMCD.
I think for us Mac Heads, its gotta be the "inconvenient truth" that you already know -
1. loop with one DAW, SRC after the fact, live with the small difference in sound.
2. use two DAWs, one at the native rate, second at delivery rate.
3. SRC everything to the same Samp Rate at the Beginning of the session, puts the change at the beginning rather than the end, less surprises that way.
JT
