R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18   Go Down

Author Topic: IMP12 discussion thread  (Read 29027 times)

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
IMP12 discussion thread
« on: June 04, 2007, 11:00:49 am »

*breathes deeply*

AHHHHHHH  fresh air..............

mixes are due wednesday 6/6/2007
Logged

CHANCE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4584
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2007, 01:42:44 pm »

Just curious what is the approx BPM of this. I ask because in order for me to import this into the Mackie HDR, I had to create a "new project". I did this in 16/44.1. Then I went back to an earlier post and discovered this project is at 48. which might give me a slower playback. It seems slow, but everything sounds natrual as far as timber goes. I hope I have time to do this. It took some time to learn to get the Rar converted and into the HDR, but now I have it down.
Logged
Chance Pataki
The Musicians Workshop
musicians.workshop@gte.net
http://www.the-musicians-workshop.com


A person is a biological signal processor--EQ mag

Red Tape

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2007, 01:50:00 pm »

I'd just like to say that I can't believe the trash talk that was going on in the other thread.
J - Please pay these people no attention, and remember that the majority are delighted to take part in, or just observe the IMP process.

Dear fools..
If you don't like it, keep quiet and/or spend your time elsewhere.
Bitching about the song/rules is incredibly, incredibly lame.
Logged

UnderTow

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 393
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2007, 02:16:03 pm »

Chance, I've got it at 84 BPM.

Alistair
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2007, 02:23:47 pm »

UnderTow wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 13:16

Chance, I've got it at 84 BPM.

Alistair



indeed.

it's 84bpm, sorry, i meant to post that earlier.

also, the tracks are 24bit i think.

Logged

CHANCE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4584
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2007, 03:23:05 pm »

Since I imported it @ 16/44, would that make it appear to be slower?
Logged
Chance Pataki
The Musicians Workshop
musicians.workshop@gte.net
http://www.the-musicians-workshop.com


A person is a biological signal processor--EQ mag

dconstruction

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 187
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2007, 03:32:17 pm »

Yeah, by 8.125%:

44.1 / 48 = 91.875%

So it'd appear to be 77.175bpm.

Also, it'd sound lower by that same percentage.  That's real close to a half-step down:

100% (an octave) / 12 = 8.33%

L
Logged

Iain Graham

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 361
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2007, 03:37:50 pm »

Only if it wasn't sample rate converted.

If SRC was applied it'll be fine, if not it'll play back slow and a half step down like dconstruction said.

Can the mackie take external clock?

YOu couldd always clock it to a 48k source and force it back up.

Might be interestung if your board is digital though.....
Logged
Iain Graham

www . iain - graham . com

http://www.myspace.com/iain_graham

www . soundart . com

audiosculpture

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2007, 05:27:02 pm »

now that all of that's out of the way, let me say hi.  my name is tony, i am going to submit my first IMP this week.  i've wanted to participate in the past, but never had the time.  for what it's worth, i like the song a lot.

scottoliphant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 721
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2007, 06:46:34 pm »

hey tony! welcome to the fun

J-Texas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1212
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2007, 06:50:24 pm »

j.hall wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 10:00

*breathes deeply*

AHHHHHHH  fresh air..............




J. is that around 9K?  Smile
Logged
Jason Thompson
www.4141studios.com

Fibes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4306
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2007, 08:51:46 pm »

J-Texas wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 18:50

j.hall wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 10:00

*breathes deeply*

AHHHHHHH  fresh air..............




J. is that around 9K?  Smile


Higher!

At last the mix is printed, saved to a safe spot and ready for the world to wallow in its crappiness.

I had a wonderful time stripping the female vocal from the awesome conversation that was going on. Too bad all i found out is that Newcastle was the drink of the night among other personal opinions about someones sister.

I keed I keed.



Logged
Fibes
-------------------------------------------------
"You can like it, or not like it."
The Studio

  http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewArtist ?id=155759887
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse2

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2007, 09:53:10 pm »

how much compression was applied to hear such conversations?

Logged

J-Texas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1212
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #13 on: June 04, 2007, 10:00:23 pm »

Fibes wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 19:51

Too bad all i found out is that Newcastle was the drink of the night...


Ahhh. This explains the need for the chaser of Antares!

Really though, the girl had a wonderful voice. I wanted to use her as the lead, but it didn't make sense at all times.

Cool track. I had fun. I can't wait for everyone to bruise it. That's the point of this thing, right? CONSTRUCTIVE criticism?

Shocked
Logged
Jason Thompson
www.4141studios.com

Fibes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4306
Re: IMP12 discussion thread
« Reply #14 on: June 04, 2007, 11:10:36 pm »

j.hall wrote on Mon, 04 June 2007 21:53

how much compression was applied to hear such conversations?




FWIW the only compression I used was on the 2 buss.


This is a compression and reverb free mix.


Oh and not one piece of processing (sans 2 buss) I've ever used before.
....and the tail of the bass track made for a great science experiment track.


Within everything there is opportunity come mix time.






49 hours til the reveal.








Logged
Fibes
-------------------------------------------------
"You can like it, or not like it."
The Studio

  http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewArtist ?id=155759887
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse
http://cdbaby.com/cd/superhorse2

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18   Go Up