R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Down

Author Topic: CAD Equitek E-200  (Read 10177 times)

grantis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1407
CAD Equitek E-200
« on: May 31, 2007, 02:16:54 am »

Anybody ever used this microphone?

I just demo-ed one, and IMO, it sounds AWFUL.  Cheap sounding low end, honky mids, absent high end.  I'd heard good things about it too......
Logged
Grant Craig
Nuovo Music (Me)
Skiddco Music (Where I work)
Work History (Well, some of it anyway)

scottoliphant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 721
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2007, 08:56:40 am »

a friend of mine had an older e200, recording an entire singer songwriter thing straight to disk, i thought it sounded great. not sure if the newer cad mics are the same quality? or maybe it just worked well for his gig

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2007, 10:39:41 am »

the E-100's are amazing for tom mics, rooms, bass, acoustic git, and some vocals
Logged

jimmyjazz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1885
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2007, 10:42:53 am »

I think the E-100 is quite a bit more useful than the E-200.  I have an E-300 which has seen a fair amount of lead vocal duty.  It's not a good fit for everyone, but on the right singer, it works great.  (This is a familiar story, no?)
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2007, 10:44:42 am »

jimmyjazz wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 09:42

but on the right singer, it works great.  (This is a familiar story, no?)


nope.  Shure SM-7 works on every one i've put on it.
Logged

grantis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1407
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2007, 11:13:15 am »

maybe it just didn't work on my vocal, and perhaps it would sound great on somebody else..... but for about the same money, i could get an SM-7.....i've heard those work on EVERYBODY.
Logged
Grant Craig
Nuovo Music (Me)
Skiddco Music (Where I work)
Work History (Well, some of it anyway)

M Carter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 369
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2007, 01:16:58 pm »

And funny, I've had an RE20 work more often than an SM7....

gofigure.
Logged
Matt Carter
General Manager
Manhattan Sound Recording
www.manhattansoundrecording.com
(212) 564 8248

NelsonL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1233
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2007, 03:48:18 pm »

I've been neglecting my E-100, gonna have to trot that sucker out.

We use an RE-20 on vox all the time. I'm thinking of grabbing a PR-40 soon too.
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2007, 04:06:25 pm »

M Carter wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16

And funny, I've had an RE20 work more often than an SM7....

gofigure.



well, we are talking about two mics built specifically for the capture of the human voice.

which ever you prefer, the application is the same.

don't get me wrong, i totally dig seeing a big U-47 in front of a singer, i just got tired of lining up 3 - 6 mics to hear which one would work best.  the  SM-7 just works every time i've tried it.  in the last 2 years, i've stopped reaching for anything else.
Logged

M Carter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 369
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2007, 04:25:04 pm »

That's what I was getting at.  It's crazy how the same tool works so differently in someone else's hands.

rattleyour -

the pr-40 is great.  I've tried it on vocals, kick, and bass, sounded great on all of them.
Logged
Matt Carter
General Manager
Manhattan Sound Recording
www.manhattansoundrecording.com
(212) 564 8248

pg666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 332
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2007, 04:36:28 pm »

Quote:

the SM-7 just works every time i've tried it. in the last 2 years, i've stopped reaching for anything else.


surprised you haven't tried the M88, but i agree the sm7 is great.

i sang on a record with 4 songs through a $6,000 josephson mic and 4 songs with an M88. the josephson needed some de-essing and eq, the M88 needed nothing.

go figure.
Logged

Iain Graham

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 361
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2007, 04:57:56 pm »

M88 is great. Superb in a bass drum too, but the diaphragms don't take it too well for a long time.

I've never liked an RE-20 on anything, but it's possible the one I have access to is knackered and that's why I don't like it. A couple of the other techs use it fairly often, just not my thing.

The one time I used an SM-7 I liked it. Through a chandler channel strip if I remember rightly.
Logged
Iain Graham

www . iain - graham . com

http://www.myspace.com/iain_graham

www . soundart . com

NelsonL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1233
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2007, 05:53:34 pm »

M Carter wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 13:25

That's what I was getting at.  It's crazy how the same tool works so differently in someone else's hands.

rattleyour -

the pr-40 is great.  I've tried it on vocals, kick, and bass, sounded great on all of them.


Indeed, one of our guys tends to reach for his U-87 every time on vox-- doesn't always stick with it but that's his first shot.

Personally, I usually prefer our iFet7-- but homeboy kinda avoids it. Diff'nt Strokes...

I've recorded some lovely vox with a KM-84, not one you hear about much for singing.
Logged

grantis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1407
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2007, 06:33:37 pm »

yeah, the engineer (who shall remain nameless.....) who did my band's dying record used an M88 on the snare.  MOST BEAUTIFUL THING I'VE EVER HEARD.  ok, perhaps an exageration, but it worked really well.
Logged
Grant Craig
Nuovo Music (Me)
Skiddco Music (Where I work)
Work History (Well, some of it anyway)

M Carter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 369
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2007, 11:03:11 pm »

Yeah, the M88's are great for snares, kicks, toms, etc.
Logged
Matt Carter
General Manager
Manhattan Sound Recording
www.manhattansoundrecording.com
(212) 564 8248

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #15 on: June 01, 2007, 11:38:06 am »

grant richard wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 17:33

yeah, the engineer (who shall remain nameless.....) who did my band's dying record used an M88 on the snare.  MOST BEAUTIFUL THING I'VE EVER HEARD.  ok, perhaps an exageration, but it worked really well.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

nice!!!!
Logged

malice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 799
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2007, 05:29:00 pm »

j.hall wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06

M Carter wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16

And funny, I've had an RE20 work more often than an SM7....

gofigure.



well, we are talking about two mics built specifically for the capture of the human voice.


I am sure you realised by now that it is the case for most of the kik drum mikes such as D12, D25, RE20, M88, MD421,

The less popular kik drum mikes were NOT designed for vocals

like : the D112, the Beta 52 etc ...


Quote:

don't get me wrong, i totally dig seeing a big U-47 in front of a singer, i just got tired of lining up 3 - 6 mics to hear which one would work best. the SM-7 just works every time i've tried it. in the last 2 years, i've stopped reaching for anything else.



No offense, but you must be recording the same kinda music every fucking day the past two years. Beacause as much as I like the SM-7, I couldn't imagine not "reaching for anything else" for two years for vocal recordings  ...    Shocked

malice

rankus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5560
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2007, 05:51:54 pm »



LOL , different strokes...

I put up my SM7 for just about every vocal tracking session (shootout), and haven't ever used it on a recording yet.

Used it on snare a few times...

Got a female punker doing scratch tracks tonight,.. I think I will try out the 7 in honor of this thread.

Logged
Rick Welin - Clark Drive Studios http://www.myspace.com/clarkdrivestudios

Ive done stuff I'm not proud of.. and the stuff I am proud of is disgusting ~ Moe Sizlack

"There is no crisis in energy, the crisis is in imagination" ~ Buckminster Fuller

starscream2010

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2007, 10:47:13 pm »

I own an older pair of E-200's (can't speak for the new ones) and though I haven't used them in a while... they work on some vocalists, some not... just like anything else.

IMHO, I think that they beat out most chinese ldc's that I've heard in pretty much any application. I now have a pair of 4033's so, I no longer have a use for the CAD's. Hope this helps some.
Logged
"Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax... "

Nick Evans

www.nickolusevans.com

grantis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1407
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2007, 11:10:49 pm »

yeah, most of the opinions i'm hearing are saying that the old ones were far superior to the newer ones.  i guess CAD used a cheaper capsule in the new ones.  
Logged
Grant Craig
Nuovo Music (Me)
Skiddco Music (Where I work)
Work History (Well, some of it anyway)

Andy Peters

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1124
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2007, 04:33:50 pm »

grant richard wrote on Wed, 30 May 2007 23:16

Anybody ever used this microphone?

I just demo-ed one, and IMO, it sounds AWFUL.  Cheap sounding low end, honky mids, absent high end.  I'd heard good things about it too......


I have a pair of E-100s that are my go-to mics for guitar amps.  And ages ago, when I recorded a band I was in, we auditioned a handful of the Usual Suspect LDCs for vocals and the E-200 was our choice.

The trick with these CADs is that they have a pair of 9V NiCd batteries that actually power the electronics.  The phantom power trickle-charges the batteries.

NiCds don't have infinite recharge cycles so at some point (after several years, in my case) the batteries won't be fully charged, which of course affects everything.  Hit the local Radio Shack for replacements, install the batteries, leave the mic plugged in to a phantom power source overnight (with the power switch OFF) and you'll be good to go.

It's possible, then, that the batteries in the mic you demoed were either on their last legs or not fully charged to start with.  I recall that the data sheet for the mics said to charge them before initial use, and your demo mics might not have been charged.

-a

PS: my E-100s are the original, with the goofy mic-stand attachment, not the new spider shock-mount thing.
Logged
"On the Internet, nobody can hear you mix a band."

grantis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1407
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2007, 05:35:27 pm »

Quote:

It's possible, then, that the batteries in the mic you demoed were either on their last legs or not fully charged to start with. I recall that the data sheet for the mics said to charge them before initial use, and your demo mics might not have been charged.



Yup they are dead as a doornail.....they don't even make the meter move on the battery tester.....charging as we speak......hope that helps.  thanks a lot!
Logged
Grant Craig
Nuovo Music (Me)
Skiddco Music (Where I work)
Work History (Well, some of it anyway)

Iain Graham

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 361
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2007, 08:54:56 pm »

rtfm?  Razz  Laughing
Logged
Iain Graham

www . iain - graham . com

http://www.myspace.com/iain_graham

www . soundart . com

Hallams

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2007, 10:37:18 pm »

Another thing i found about the E-200 is they have a narrow sweet spot so if the singer likes moving around a bit, it can be a problem. Of course someone could come up with a nifty chineese manufactured extention to the boom stand that would clamp the singers head in a nice focused position....
Logged
Chris Hallam.
Melbourne, Australia.
 

Iain Graham

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 361
Re: CAD Equitek E-200
« Reply #24 on: June 04, 2007, 12:26:54 am »

I've often thought of creating such a device, but more for inexperienced singers who won't stay on axis while I'm trying to mix wedges for them.

They then comlain when it either isn't loud enough or feeding back.

I've wondered about some piano or cheese wire attached to it and looped around their bollocks. i t should certanly be an attachment you can add for repeat offenders.  Laughing
Logged
Iain Graham

www . iain - graham . com

http://www.myspace.com/iain_graham

www . soundart . com
Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Up