R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Senate Passes War Spending Bill  (Read 742 times)

Jessica A. Engle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 736
Senate Passes War Spending Bill
« on: March 29, 2007, 12:57:28 PM »

This sounds like it should be good news..... right?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Senate Passes War Spending Bill with Withdrawal Deadline

POSTED: 12:21 p.m. EDT, March 29, 2007
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Senate Democrats ignored a veto threat and pushed through a bill Thursday requiring President Bush to start withdrawing troops from "the civil war in Iraq," dealing a rare, sharp rebuke to a wartime commander in chief.

In a mostly party line 51-47 vote, the Senate signed off on a bill providing $122 billion to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also orders Bush to begin withdrawing troops within 120 days of passage while setting a nonbinding goal of ending combat operations by March 31, 2008.

The vote came shortly after Bush invited all House Republicans to the White House to appear with him in a sort of pep rally to bolster his position in the continuing war policy fight.

"We stand united in saying loud and clear that when we've got a troop in harm's way, we expect that troop to be fully funded," Bush said, surrounded by Republicans on the North Portico, "and we got commanders making tough decisions on the ground, we expect there to be no strings on our commanders."

"We expect the Congress to be wise about how they spend the people's money," he said.

The Senate vote marked its boldest challenge yet to the administration's handling of a war, now in its fifth year, that has cost the lives of more than 3,200 American troops and more than $350 billion. In a show of support for the president, most Republicans opposed the measure, unwilling to back a troop withdrawal schedule despite the conflict's widespread unpopularity.

"Surely this will embolden the enemy and it will not help our troops in any way," said Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alabama.

Forty-eight Democrats and independent Bernard Sanders of Vermont were joined by two Republicans, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Gordon Smith of Oregon, in voting for the measure. Opposed were 46 Republicans and Connecticut independent Joseph Lieberman..... read the rest here.
Logged

Barry Hufker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8228
Re: Senate Passes War Spending Bill
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2007, 01:27:11 PM »

Yes, it sounds like good news.  If Bush vetoes it, he cuts off funding for the war.  If he allows it he has to start pulling troops.

Barry
Logged

Die BREMSSPUR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 849
Re: Senate Passes War Spending Bill
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2007, 01:34:10 PM »

Barry Hufker wrote on Thu, 29 March 2007 19:27

Yes, it sounds like good news.  If Bush vetoes it, he cuts off funding for the war.  If he allows it he has to start pulling troops.

Barry



Bear,

They won't stop funding the war.

But this vote makes sense, maybe it shows the idiot percentage in 'merica is hovering at around 60%
Logged
I used to be self-effacing but I couldn't even do that right
http://www.pmtstudios.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 20 queries.