Brian Kehew wrote on Tue, 16 January 2007 04:16 |
Agreed, in fact, most of the PRE-Beatles Abbey Road music is superior, sonically speaking.
|
Sarusan wrote on Tue, 16 January 2007 12:58 |
I think the same is true for the pre-rock recordings done in Hollywood as well: RCA, United and Western, Columbia, etc.. I heard a bunch of my father's records from that era over the holidays (Bobby Darin, Sinatra, Mancini, etc..) and was simultaneously amazed and bummed out. None of us will ever get the chance to do records that will sound that great.
|
Steven,
Yes, all of those records you mentioned were great, BUT there was still a BIG difference between the Sinatra recordings (at least those LA recorded Capitol ones, Arranged by Nelson Riddle and Produced by Voyle Gilmore, best case in point being "Wee Small Hours") and the Bobby Darin New York recordings (Produced by Ahmet and Neshui, Engineered by Tom Dowd).
The Sinatra recordings mentioned were amazingly full and warm, and beautiful. The Bobby Darin ones, whilst awesome, and amongst my very favourites, were in comparison more strident, and showed a few engineering flaws. I spoke to Tom Dowd about this very thing in 1968, and he lamented about several vocal rides he had "missed," and spoke with huge admiration for the warmth of those Sinatra recordings.
Even then, all things were never equal.
As for The Beatles' vinyl, I always thought that that by far the best were the original UK mono pressings on Parlophone.