R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: IMP7 discussion.  (Read 17324 times)

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
IMP7 discussion.
« on: September 19, 2006, 10:41:58 am »

have at it.
Logged

Randy Hansen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 46
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2006, 01:34:43 pm »

Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2006, 01:35:24 pm »

please repost that in the "submission" thread at the top of my forum.
Logged

cerberus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2651
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2006, 02:54:11 pm »

i tried to bring the fidelity up, so that i could have the full arrangement.

this will be a perfect test for my discrete method... only the drums and bgv were subgrouped, but those busses run in parallel to the discrete tracks.   everthing else is totally treated as a separate puzzle piece...honed to fit with the others, or not treated at all (grindy guitars!),    

all is summed at the master fader, with nothing whatsoever  on the master fader as has become my usual imp practice.  look ma, no glue!

does anyone else mix in the complete discrete instrument style?


jeff dinces

NelsonL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1233
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2006, 02:55:11 pm »

Chris J, I'm assuming you pitched everything down on purpose.

Just checking in case it's a sample rate issue.
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2006, 03:11:19 pm »

sounds like a sample rate issue to me.

tracks were at 48k, NOT 44.1

liam, it's scary how similar our mixes are........
Logged

dconstruction

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 187
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2006, 04:16:36 pm »

It's got to be a sample problem.  Or maybe not: the drums sound cool.  But, wow, it's hard to listen to this one slowed down like that.  After hearing this song, oh, forty million times, this crunk version tears my liver out.
Logged

NelsonL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1233
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2006, 04:30:11 pm »

dconstruction wrote on Tue, 19 September 2006 13:16

It's got to be a sample problem.  Or maybe not: the drums sound cool.  But, wow, it's hard to listen to this one slowed down like that.  After hearing this song, oh, forty million times, this crunk version tears my liver out.


How's a Texas boy going to sip on some "lo-knees" with no liver?

Nice tracks by the way.

J, thanks for the comparison, I'm flattered.

I'm pulling a copy cat of sorts on you again in November-- didja get my email?
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2006, 04:35:04 pm »

email not received......
Logged

Calvin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2006, 05:12:02 pm »

When's the absolute deadline tonight?  I'm still hoping to crank out my mix, but probably won't be done 'till around midnight eastern.  Too late?
Logged

j.hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3787
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2006, 05:14:18 pm »

if the thread is not locked then post.

i try to lock it around midnight central time, which is 1am eastern.  some times i forget till the morning.
Logged

Calvin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2006, 05:19:26 pm »

j.hall wrote on Tue, 19 September 2006 17:14

if the thread is not locked then post.

i try to lock it around midnight central time, which is 1am eastern.  some times i forget till the morning.



I like the idea of forgetting to lock it until morning...nevertheless, I should be able to wrap up by midnight central time. If not, my loss.

Thanks, and thanks for running these IMPs.  Great stuff!  Your efforts are much appreciated.
Logged

chrisj

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 959
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2006, 06:04:03 pm »

Whoa. I _thought_ Logic didn't seem to be doing much obvious SRCing. Files at 48, Logic set to 44.1, unlike say Audacity Logic is like 'dum de dum, what sample rate problem?'

Fortunately it's pretty easy to change and the deadline ain't up yet. Yow. Gimme a minute 'k?

Tom C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 377
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2006, 06:26:31 pm »

chrisj wrote on Wed, 20 September 2006 00:04


Fortunately it's pretty easy to change and the deadline ain't up yet. Yow. Gimme a minute 'k?


I've replaced your file in my original posting.
Sounds better now!
Logged
Tom

.signature failure

chrisj

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 959
Re: IMP7 discussion.
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2006, 06:37:11 pm »

(posting lastminute rev see below)

I actually liked the other version. Thought you was a big ol' John Kay stud-bull Laughing

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13   Go Up