Thanks for the input guys.
We're not going for the s3a's. They're too small for the room I think - which is fairly dead sounding, or, it's more like a good sounding (balanced) living room than the anechoic approach many go for these days...I just can't work when my ears feel they're floating around in a vacuum. I may get a pair of s3a's and whack them in a flight for off-site recordings though...
For the records: To be honest I'm not the biggest fan of the genelec's top-end. But I know where it sits, so I can mix on them. I do like the s3a tweeters though.
This is my ultimate quest for mid-to-large, honest sounding monitors. What I don't want is something that will sit in my control room and sound like a set of Boxers. It's not about finding the most "bang", "bling" or "boom" for the buck. I need a monitor large enough to tell me what's going on in the very-lows (50Hz region), without coloring the mids and highs. I guess you all know what I'm getting at here.
I do a lot of jazz recordings/mixing, and the phase behaviour of my monitors is crucial. The adams have word on them for being one of the best in that respect too. I'm just afraid that I'll gain something and lose something else - especially in monitors as large as the s5a's (MK2).
To cut an already too long post, short - I want to know what's wrong with these things. New technologies usually bring new problems. What are they? All I can find is (biased) magazines going crazy over these things. I just can't trust a review that takes price into account...
Again, if anyone has ever even listened to the bigger ADAM's then I would really appreciate it if you would share your experiences.
Best regards,
Yngve