R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Hype v. Reality  (Read 4328 times)

Trumpetman2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 357
Hype v. Reality
« on: August 25, 2006, 11:25:32 AM »

 Shocked Ok guys, I give up...please explain this to me - I own 5 or 6 pretty decent mic pres; Ward-Beck custom twin rack 470D; Presonus MP 20; Grace Design 101, Modified Paia tube pre; and quite a few others like these.  The point is that I bought a "cheapo" Rolls mic processor (GC 111 something...can't even remember) it is a half-rack unit and not impressive looking at all...well, the sad (or good) part is that it beats the pants off of any of my other "more pro" mic pres.  I have tried many mics on all the pres (Sennheiser 441, RCA ribbon, Rode NTK, Oktava 319, etc. ) and the Rolls is absolutely the best, clearest, strongest sounding of all on all of the mics....what gives? Shocked  
Logged

Dave Martin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 331
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2006, 11:31:01 AM »

I'd suggest that it's as simple as the fact that you like the sound of the Rolls better than the other preamps you have. No mystery there, since all of this is 'opinion', not 'fact'...

How does multiple tracks recorded with the pre work together?
Logged

Trumpetman2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 357
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2006, 01:00:48 PM »

Dave:  You have a point, but one would think that a "much better/more pro" preamp would simply be audibly superior...I guess there is no such thing....  Only record my trumpet track through the Rolls so don't know how it would do on multiple tracks.  Do you have a favorite low-cost preamp you recommend? Shocked
Logged

wwittman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7712
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2006, 11:04:12 PM »

maybe none of those IS "much" better
Logged
William Wittman
Producer/Engineer
(Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield, Hooters...)

maxim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5828
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2006, 02:08:33 AM »

might be comparing oranges to oranges
Logged

dcgzr

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2006, 07:03:46 AM »

Just because it's cheap does not mean that it can't be the best option for the situation. There has been times my $300 At4033 sounded better than my $3000 vintage U87 in certain applications. Not often though. But it has happened

Logged

Trumpetman2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 357
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2006, 08:28:44 AM »

wwittman wrote on Fri, 25 August 2006 23:04

maybe none of those IS "much" better


Agree...so, as I originally asked - what do you pros consider to be a very good mic pre that doesn't cost $5K????  Is in fact, the Brick a decent piece of gear...? Don't be like that stingy genius, Rudy Van Gelder who never has told anyone how he recorded or even what microphones he used.... Sad  
Logged

Dave Martin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 331
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2006, 09:09:28 AM »

None of my preamps cost $5K, but none of them are what are generally considered to be 'intexpensive' - at least, not on a budget forum....

In order of use (most used as the top):
Great River NV
Vintech X73
Daking
DRS-2
Manley
Vac Rac
Great River MP-2
Studio Electronic Pre2
Universal Audio (2108? can't remember model number)
MTA A Range
Drawmer 1969 preamps
If there are more in the racks, I've forgotten them for the moment...
The top 3 listed are used on every project - some multiple times - while the bottom two or three are seldom (if ever) used.
Logged

Jack Schitt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 648
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2006, 10:27:21 AM »

The Brick is a capable piece of equipment. Doesn't have the slut factor going for it like a ViPRE would but I don't have the budget for that luxury
Logged

Trumpetman2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 357
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2006, 03:18:35 PM »

Dave:  Thanks much.  You are generous in sharing your gear list.  I think I'm going to get a Vintech....have heard much about it and as you say, they aren't really all that expensive Rolling Eyes b
Logged

compasspnt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16266
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2006, 03:48:26 PM »


The Brick is an excellent mic pre sound-wise, but it has no features at all.

Features are not that necessary.

Good sound is.
Logged

wwittman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7712
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2006, 05:45:11 PM »

A Daking or an API (even with an added EQ) won't cost anywhere near $5000

Logged
William Wittman
Producer/Engineer
(Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield, Hooters...)

Trumpetman2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 357
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2006, 06:20:57 PM »

wwittman wrote on Sat, 26 August 2006 17:45

A Daking or an API (even with an added EQ) won't cost anywhere near $5000



Right you are...and since I only need one channel, I'm actually thinking I can buy the GR 1NV...only a little more than a grand....AND it's at the top of Dave Martin's list!!!!!   Thanks to all who replied! Cool
Logged

Tomas Danko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4733
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2006, 11:23:30 AM »

Actually, there is one dark horse among the Rolls family. It's a very anonymous micpreamp containing a Burr Brown OP-amp and it's not at all bad sounding. Perhaps this may be the one?

Then again, what happens if you crank the snot out of it, and then compare this to the Great River or such? I wonder...
Logged
http://www.danko.se/site-design/dankologo4s.gif
"T(Z)= (n1+n2*Z^-1+n2*Z^-2)/(1+d1*z^-1+d2*z^-2)" - Mr. Dan Lavry
"Shaw baa laa raaw, sidle' yaa doot in dee splaa" . Mr Shooby Taylor

Dave Martin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 331
Re: Hype v. Reality
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2006, 12:33:57 PM »

Trumpetman2 wrote on Sat, 26 August 2006 17:20

wwittman wrote on Sat, 26 August 2006 17:45

A Daking or an API (even with an added EQ) won't cost anywhere near $5000



Right you are...and since I only need one channel, I'm actually thinking I can buy the GR 1NV...only a little more than a grand....AND it's at the top of Dave Martin's list!!!!!   Thanks to all who replied! Cool


I should have specified - all of the top three are used all the time (I have a hard time moving the Dakings off of kick and snare, where they are ALWAYS used, so the Great River and Vintechs are used a more for overdubs.) And the bottom two are seldom used - pretty much, only when I'm tracking full rhythm sections and get low on preamps...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 16 queries.