Good point. However, I had not even gotten to the point of hearing the session files through the chain when I noticed the phase anomaly while calibrating with an oscillator. I am transferring some rock music from 88.2 to tape (at customer request) [ATR-102 0.5" 456, 30ips...] and have the use of two EQs - the MEA-2 and the Passive. We ended up quitting early after preparing the process EDL because I wanted to be able to use the Passive in a repeatable condition. I figured, if it's functioning properly, and hf phase distortion is what it is supposed to add, then cool, let's try it. But if it's something broken, like that the trannies are funky and will sound different when fixed, better is almost worse! (j/k)... I realize that this is a little bit insane, since the tape machine is going to introduce enough distortion to swamp what the Passive was doing, especially since his mixes are from tracks off a 2" 16 track and have been Smarted and Chandlerized to a very "warm" degree by the previous studio... But if something is broken I'll be too distracted worrying over it to give it an objective chance. Happily my client is very understanding of this voodoo and insists on letting me sort this out before we proceed.
The good news is...
Per Manley's tech's advice, as soon as I switched to the unbalanced outputs, the
problem went away. So, apparently, one of the output x-formers is not passing high frequencies at the same level as the other. But its effect is extremely subtle. It is minute enough a difference so as not to pull the direction of the X-Y trace away from 45 degrees in any noticeable way. The trace only begins to swell in the middle - this ultra thin line that starts to become almond-shaped as F is raised. For now I am now using the 1/4" I/Os - which are balanced in and unbalanced out.
_andrew