how are you guys naming your "master" files.esp those doing alot of digital delivery.i used to go: track_number-song_name-versionthese days im more inclined to use the file name as i got it from the client with a -version after it.
these days im more inclined to use the file name as i got it from the client with a -version after it.
That's what I'll do. Song name as provided by the client.I'll include the song number if the client has it in the name originally.If there is a revision, I'll put the revision number after the name.If I do a couple versions of the same song,I'll put a general code like Bv, H^, Mv, or L^Where B is bass H is highs M is Mids and L is Level..and I'll add 24 if it's 24 bit
What happens when you get Sibilant Highs with Impacting Transients?
It's pretty embarrassing to even see a post about it. Nothing gets easier.
I have to admit I find it interesting seeing how other ME's label their audio.
Depends, if it's a few tracks so long as the track has a name I just add the word "master" and the SR. If it's a compilation it gets T1,T2,T3 this stuff should not really need to be asked about. It's pretty embarrassing to even see a post about it. Nothing gets easier.
rock_song_McCaigs_best_possible_work_really.wav
Mine go: TrackNumber_RevNumberIfNeeded_SongTitle_Formatie: 01_RockSong_16441.wav
01_RevRun-RevTheEngineForRevolution_1644_r1
Seriously if labelling files has become of great interest I will focus on audio quality while you focus on file names, lol.
I've become a little lazy. I used to separate_everything_with_these_thingys, but these days, I usually type the CD text ready for the first time and let Samplitude to the prefix number automatically when exporting separate WAV's. If it's a revision, I add a "_v2" at the end, if it's a new mix it's "_newmix_v2".