| Pingu wrote on Wed, 18 January 2006 07:16 |
IF you a/b 2 different masters of the same mix and one sounds
objectively more listener friendly in mono, would you say this master has been mastered "better"
|
"Better", maybe, in that one specific respect. But it is perfectly possible to have a rich, large presentation in stereo with not to large losses in mono. There is always an ambience loss in mono.
I'd rather have a master that sounds better in stereo than another master as long as the losses in mono are not that great.
But when you say "listener-friendly", can you elaborate?
BK
