R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Yesterday at 06:24:53 pm 
Started by mu90r - Last post by klaus
Thanks, Mike, you have some good points.

I assumed that a close-up view of the backplate would be sufficient to determine the model of Jose's capsule.

I agree, removing one of the four big screws might seem scary to the novice, though no real damage to the capsule should ensue, unless you slip with your screwdriver, or get into a raging fit of frustration.

To you question: After removal of contamination of the kind seen on Jose's capsule, return to factory performance can be expected in most cases. But only professional cleaning, (professional underlined!) will leave the sputtering intact, and avoid introducing additional contamination which could infiltrate the space between diaphragms and backplates.

 2 
 on: Yesterday at 04:21:07 pm 
Started by mu90r - Last post by mikezietsman
Klaus,
I think the OP perhaps found it a bit scary to do what at first glance might feel like taking a capsule apart.

It was only when I happened on a small stash of completely trashed k67 capsules that I figure out quite how they are put together and that the four bigger screws hold the two halves together (and that the smaller screws are best left completely untouched!)

I also figured out that if I was working on a possibly reparable example of the capsules that I would want a very steady hand!


In your estimation would a capsule in that state be restorable to full operation through cleaning?


 3 
 on: Yesterday at 06:50:03 am 
Started by TermoPlenka - Last post by TermoPlenka
Хай теплоты в ваши дачи!
Считаю это будет одним из лучших подарков в хозяйтве.
Про Пленка для утепления окон много мифов и споров, но
посудите сами вот  http://plenka.buyonline.su/images/shema_okna.jpg - инструкция для применения Термоплёнка на окна
По параметрам: ширина-1.10 м.,длина-6 м.,пленка- 6.6 кв.м.(хвататет на 3 окна) +рулон двухстороннего прозрачного скотча и главное - низкая цена!
Вот несколько интересных советов плёнка для окон купить:
http://lonevelde.lovasok.hu/out_link.php?url=http://plenka.buyonline.su
http://xn--80a7ahd.xn--p1ai/bitrix/rk.php?goto=http://plenka.buyonline.su
http://cmfans.cn/uchome/link.php?url=http://plenka.buyonline.su
Очень доволен и рекомендую посмотреть здесь:
www.plenka.buyonline.su - пленка для утепления окон купить
(067)-585-58-47, (050)-202-60-72
Могу помочь или подсказать Александр (alexandr_sheva/шабака/mail.ru)

 4 
 on: January 16, 2018, 05:08:55 pm 
Started by TermoPlenka - Last post by TermoPlenka
Привет комфорта в ваши дачи!
Считаю это будет одним из лучших подарков в хозяйтве.
Про Пленка для окон купить много мифов и споров, но
посудите сами вот  http://plenka.buyonline.su/images/shema_okna.jpg - инструкция для применения Пленка для окон купить
По параметрам: ширина-1.10 м.,длина-6 м.,пленка- 6.6 кв.м.(хвататет на 3 окна) +рулон двухстороннего прозрачного скотча и главное - низкая цена!
Здесь парочка интересных отзывов термоплёнка окна:
http://clickand.co/h2za9
http://t.sigopn01.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplenka.buyonline.su&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIC61PoJDA&k=f761713e-acfc-4d31-9232-b572290be974
http://freeninjaproxy.info/index.php?e=curl_error&return=http://plenka.buyonline.su
Очень доволен и рекомендую найти перейдите:
www.plenka.buyonline.su - плёнка На Стекло
(067)-585-58-47, (050)-202-60-72
Могу подсказать или подсказать Александр (alexandr_sheva/шабака/mail.ru)

 5 
 on: January 16, 2018, 02:49:46 am 
Started by TermoPlenka - Last post by TermoPlenka
Привет уюта в ваши дома!
Считаю это будет одним из лучших подарков в хозяйтве.
Про Пленка для окон купить много мифов и споров, но
посудите сами вот  http://plenka.buyonline.su/images/shema_okna.jpg - инструкция для применения TERMO PLENKA
По параметрам: ширина-1.10 м.,длина-6 м.,пленка- 6.6 кв.м.(хвататет на 3 окна) +рулон двухстороннего прозрачного скотча и главное - низкая цена!
Вот несколько новых отзывов плёнка для утепления окон:
http://www.careuc.com/ispace/link.php?url=http://plenka.buyonline.su
http://m.crewknowledge.com/GetDrugInfo.php?DrugID=32&returnlink=http://plenka.buyonline.su
http://inppk.ru/bitrix/redirect.php?event1=&event2=&event3=&goto=http://plenka.buyonline.su
Очень доволен и рекомендую предложить можно тут:
www.plenka.buyonline.su - утепление окон на зиму
(067)-585-58-47, (050)-202-60-72
Могу подсказать или подсказать Александр (alexandr_sheva/шабака/mail.ru)

 6 
 on: January 15, 2018, 08:31:46 pm 
Started by klaus - Last post by Timtape
Before I responded, I wanted to make sure that you really meant what you wrote. And I can tell you that I know of very very few professional singers who are ignorant about the recording process to the point that they do not care how their voices translate in the studio.

And as you know I clarified my statement :  "...I'm sure the said performers do care very much that the end result is excellent, but not being experts in audio production..."

Most of my clients are so deeply engaged in the recording process, they not only actively select the mic from teh studio's locker, but bring their own vocal mic to the sessions...

Yes perhaps a different world from that of say the 1950's.
Sometimes it seems like nowadays everybody's an expert.


 7 
 on: January 15, 2018, 02:40:58 pm 
Started by klaus - Last post by klaus
Mike Rivers wrote in another forum the following, which I found interesting, and which I am quoting with his permission:

Distortion is about many things, not just about harmonics of the source coming out than what went in. Most of the difference between source and mic output is a result of mechanical resonances and uneven frequency response. Generally when you see a THD measurement of a mic, it's of the electronics alone, and doesn't include the capsule.

Making high resolution acoustic measurements on a mic is quite difficult. First you need to be able to create a sound wave in air that has an order of magnitude less distortion than the mic you're trying to measure. Then there's contributions from external noise sources that must be dealt with. There's an IEC recommended test setup that a few manufacturers have built that looks a bit like a bomb with electrical connectors.

The AES working group on microphone standards has been trying for years to come up with ways to standardize measurements.

 8 
 on: January 15, 2018, 02:17:58 pm 
Started by klaus - Last post by klaus
Before I responded, I wanted to make sure that you really meant what you wrote. And I can tell you that I know of very very few professional singers who are ignorant about the recording process to the point that they do not care how their voices translate in the studio.

Most of my clients are so deeply engaged in the recording process, they not only actively select the mic from teh studio's locker, but bring their own vocal mic to the sessions (like you would expect from instrumental performers at any professional level: Itzhak Perlman or Pinchas Zukerman don't go to the local rental shop before hitting the studio).

On a general note:

Internet forums allow all of us to mix it up with the big boys by pretending to be experts, without anyone checking at the door. Reading your many posts in this thread so far, I am curious what practical experience you have in the professional recording world?

What you have shared so far (a lot of wikipedia and other experts' citations) makes me wonder what you do for a living? Where can we hear your recordings? What are your achievements in the recording business? What mics do you use every day?

Expert knowledge is not required for most subjects on this forum. Novices are always welcome, and the level of accomplishments does not matter. But the discussion of accurate mics is not enriched when posting without extensive personal experience.


 9 
 on: January 15, 2018, 05:27:46 am 
Started by klaus - Last post by Timtape
OK will have another try.
I'm sure the said performers do care very much that the end result is excellent but not being experts in audio production they have to trust that the audio personnel they deal with are experts in their field, will give them sound, reliable advice and aren't taking advantage of the performer's weaker knowledge.


 10 
 on: January 15, 2018, 03:23:32 am 
Started by klaus - Last post by klaus
A mic that has been "personalized to the sound of my voice" might be very attractive to a performer who knows or cares little more about audio than the microphone they sing into...
What does "cares little more about audio than" mean? Someone who cares little, or who cares more?

Actually, re-reading this sentence in full, I admit, I don't understand at all what you are trying to say.
Can you rephrase please?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10