R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
 on: June 17, 2017, 02:45:45 am 
Started by Red Mastering - Last post by scott2000
I agree with the above tests...I know things can get goofy if the interconnects aren't wired correctly when going from balanced to unbalanced gear. Some balanced outputs use different methods than others. I know the Apogee I have needs to have pin 3 tied to ground if feeding unbalanced gear. I'm not sure the Myteks do.

OOPs...Pretty old post...

Sorry...New guy here...

 on: June 16, 2017, 11:54:46 pm 
Started by Mikeyod - Last post by radardoug
Mikey, thinking about it it could be a tension problem, at higher speed the motors need to turn faster so will need more drive. Do you have a tentelometer? Check tension at stop, then 15, then 30. If the takeup tension is lower at 30 that would point to a problem with the drive circuit on that side. I am going to Auckland next weekend and will check on the Studer there. The capstan card checks out fine here, all values around that output are correct. There is one Frako cap on the power supply on the board, mine metered sort of OK but I changed it anyway. It is 20 volt decoupling so I dont expect it would have been the issue.

 on: June 15, 2017, 06:06:37 pm 
Started by Mikeyod - Last post by radardoug
Hmm, from your symptoms, I would still say that it is the capstan card that is at fault. I haven't got around to measuring the same parts on the one here yet. Interesting that things improved greatly when you changed the reel bridges. Can you try running the old bridges under load on a d.c. supply? Some of these things will measure fine on a meter, but fail under load, with higher than normal saturation voltages.
Can you revisit the capstan card and see if you are getting right voltages there now? 

 on: June 14, 2017, 02:11:06 pm 
Started by NickL - Last post by klaus
Hello Nick,
First and foremost, I try as hard as I can to avoid what others are often tempted to do, and what I dislike with a passion: self promotion on an informational forum. Contact me privately for any work-related issues.

Regarding your questions:

"Handling" noise is common on C414EB. The handling noise is due to insufficient damping of the capsule against its frame, against the frame's hard rubber mount on the amp chassis. This kind of noise is in the 50-200 Hz range and hard to tame, given the tiny body of this large-diaphragm mic.

Pattern-and attenuator-switch rumbling and discharge noise, when actuating the switches ,can be tamed to a degree, on this model: AKG used primitive plating on the contact surfaces, which needs to be cleaned and re-lubricated periodically with an anti-oxidization fluid.

It is quite possible that the dirt and dust accumulation on your mic's diaphragms and backplates could be the cause of attenuated top end response: When the dirt load gets high enough, the 6 membrane can no longer follow fast (high frequency) wave lengths.
When a mic sits openly over long periods of time, airborne dust will continually fly to the unprotected capsule form as far as 6 ft. away, due to the electrostatic charge on the backplate (polarization voltage and its residue, even after disconnecting the mic from power). Capsule restoration to factory stock is often possible, provided there is no other diaphragm deterioration (see below).

If your capsule suffers from diaphragm tension loss, there is no remedy, as the diaphragms are glued to the diaphragm rings and cannot be re-tensioned.

 on: June 14, 2017, 11:40:10 am 
Started by NickL - Last post by NickL
Hello Klaus,
Well, I did as you said but I cannot see any evidence of either side being sucked in. There was no indication of that - unless it's REALLY subtle.

I changed patterns and turned the phantom power on and off but saw no effect. I did this under good light and both sides look flat and uniform. I will say, however, that the front looks very dirty. (The mic used to belong to a large, commercial studio and was used quite a lot.) However, when I reassembled the mic, the sound was vastly improved. The front of the mic sounds very good.

There is an exceptional amount of "handling" noise (I don't know if that's common for this model) and very loud sounds when I change the patterns. I tried omni and figure eight. They both appear to be working but the sound in the rear is certainly duller than in the front of the mic. Again, I don't have a clear sense of what is to be expected so the result is difficult to gauge.

I have read very high recommendations of your work. Is it possible for me to have you go through the mic and see what's going on, clean it, correct any loose connections etc.? Can you give me an idea of what a routine cleaning and maintenance would cost? If it is the diaphragm tension, then I can make decisions from there but at the very least, I think it needs to be cleaned and serviced. Are the conditions I described consistent with the loss of diaphragm tension? Do the symptoms of that type of failure occur intermittently? Thanks again for all of your help.

 on: June 14, 2017, 10:09:15 am 
Started by NickL - Last post by NickL
Thank you, Klaus. I will try this and get back to you with the results.

 on: June 13, 2017, 09:23:50 pm 
Started by J. Mike Perkins - Last post by klaus
In essence you are right in your description of the diaphragm assembly process, and therein lies the problem with "loosening the screws": Unlike other manufacturers, Neumann does not glue the diaphragms to the mounting rings, but simply affixes them with pressure from the 12 mounting screws.

That also means that loosening even one screw immediately wrinkles the diaphragm irreversibly, as there is nothing else holding the 6 thin skin in place and under tension.

 on: June 13, 2017, 09:19:55 pm 
Started by NickL - Last post by klaus
Hello Nick,

You don't provide a ton of information about the defect you discovered in your mic:
Can you influence or change the bad sound by speaking loudly or popping into the capsule, or by switching patterns? Does it sound equally dull in the back (figure eight or omni)?

There is a reasonable chance that your CK12 has lost diaphragm tension, at least on one side, if not both.
If that is so, there are no solutions but to buy a used CK12 on the market. This is especially true if you want to retain the value of a C414EB, which, equipped with the CK12 brass is worth about four or five times as much as one equipped with the Nylon/Teflon CK12.

So, next step, confirm my suspicion: take off the four slot screws at the bottom of the mic, strip off the metal housing, flip off the two basket halves, and observe, under good lighting conditions, whether one or both diaphragms are sucked in when you apply phantom power, or when you switch patterns from cardioid to figure eight.

 on: June 13, 2017, 05:57:16 pm 
Started by NickL - Last post by NickL
I'm looking for a little guidance. I have a vintage AKG C414 EB with the brass capsule. There is clearly something wrong with it as lately. Its output is very low volume and the high end is mostly gone.

I want to know if this microphone can be repaired. I don't mind spending some money as I know it's a valuable mic and it used to sound great. I just don't want to spend a lot of money on it and then end up with a teflon capsule.

I would appreciate anyone telling me their thoughts on the meaning of these symptoms, and getting a consensus on whether or not this is a repairable issue. If the capsule was blown would it be making any sound at all? Is it possibly just dirty? Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this for me.

Best, Nick.

 on: June 13, 2017, 03:30:34 pm 
Started by J. Mike Perkins - Last post by J. Mike Perkins
This may seem like an obvious question, but if some recent production Neumann K870 capsules sound "thin" from an overly tight membrane, why can't you simply loosen the screws in the plastic ring around the capsule and fix the problem? 

I watched the "How It's Made" TV show where they go to the Neumann factory to show a U87 being produced, and it looked like the screws are simply tightened manually as the capsules are assembled. 

Is there more going on than meets the eye?     

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10