R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 on: May 21, 2017, 11:39:47 am 
Started by Dan Kok - Last post by Dan Kok
4 x Danley TH115s with covers. Very good condition, no touring, local only.  $1,250 each.  Near Madison, WI.  Local pick up preferred, we'd need to talk about shipping.

 on: May 21, 2017, 10:43:14 am 
Started by RuudNL - Last post by boz6906
I've read that the USM69 is basically a double U89 circuit.

But the freq response is very different from the U89.

It does have a 5 dB bump centered at 10 kHz in Omni and Cardioid but it still sounds balanced.

 on: May 21, 2017, 09:50:59 am 
Started by RuudNL - Last post by RuudNL
At the moment I have a Neumann SM69 here for repair.
Looking at the schematic, I see that there is no de-emphasis for the microphone capsule.
But the microphone still sounds good.
As far as I know, the U87 uses the same K870 capsule, but in this microphone a de-emphasis network is used. What could be the reason for this difference?
(By the way: the SM69 is already repaired, the problem was a capacitor.)

 on: May 21, 2017, 12:47:31 am 
Started by everettmoran - Last post by everettmoran
A year and a half ago, I took delivery of RADAR Studio with PT 12 installed. For some reason, when I tried to create a new session, I was not given the option of 88.2 - precisely the sample rate my tracks had been recorded at. It was odd, as 44.1, 48, 96, 176.4 and 192 were all available, just not 88.2. The folks at iZ thought that I needed the latest driver for the Adrenaline card but, after installing the update, I can no longer even get PT to open, receiving a Windows error message. This new issue seems to be a Windows issue, as I get the same error message if I try to open Harrison Mixbus. The RADAR software works just fine.

Is anyone here running PT on a RADAR Studio system? If so, any ideas for either issue?

Thanks in advance.

Everett Moran
Rainshadow Recording
Port Townsend WA

 on: May 20, 2017, 08:52:43 pm 
Started by Mikeyod - Last post by radardoug
Its the sort of thing that an extender card will make much easier. An alternative is to solder a bunch of wires to appropriate points, so you can get the scope on to them. Once you find the source of the d.c. offset, you can go from there.

 on: May 20, 2017, 01:02:59 pm 
Started by Mikeyod - Last post by Mikeyod
Murphy is really getting a good laugh out of me lately.
After changing IC 5,6,7,8 in order ......    it still pops !
I swapped the card over from channel 2 to channel 1 just to check if I was crazy and it followed the card and now it pops the left speaker. New LM393 IC s did nothing. new MM74C374N IC nothing. R22 tested funky in circuit but was fine out at 22k. Put in new anyway no change.
Unfortunately I have no extender card so very difficult to check with scope.

 on: May 19, 2017, 12:42:58 pm 
Started by DML - Last post by tomruff
Hmmm... I'm pretty sure the DTA status port connects to the 1630 not the 2000.  The only connection between 2000 and DTA would be for timecode.


 on: May 19, 2017, 10:27:14 am 
Started by klaus - Last post by olivertaylor
writing papers sometimes can be so hard! And not always because of the difficulty of topics. There can be simply a lack of time! For such cases, use Essay Pirate - writing service with the help of which you can get all your papers done in time.

 on: May 16, 2017, 11:32:40 pm 
Started by DML - Last post by DML
Hi guys, thanks for the replies.  Yes this is 'old timer' territory, and I guess that makes me one!

To clarify: we need the cable that connects the DMR-2000 to the DTA-2000; it's shown in the DTA manual as Sony part number 1-558-117-11 'Cord with Connectors (33-36)'.  One end is as per my photo; the other is 36-pin Amphenol. 

We don't need the Cannon-D Status cable or anything else.  Or the DMR-4000 to DTA cable; that's a standard Amphenol which makes life easy for DMR-4000 users!

I'm hoping that an existing Mastering facility using DMR-2000's (not 4000's) can help.

 on: May 16, 2017, 07:42:46 am 
Started by Mikeyod - Last post by Mikeyod
Yes that was what I was thinking probably both Ic5 & 7 maybe I'll change 7 first. No, Murphy will be one up on me no matter what I do.     ; 0)

     Yes my boards have the .81 updates.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10