R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3 4  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Neve-clones again (sorry)  (Read 27255 times)

mr.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Neve-clones again (sorry)
« on: December 13, 2004, 06:58:45 AM »

Hi, this is my first post on this forum. I'm working as a producer/musican/songwriter in Norway and am currently shopping for a new two or four channel preamp. I already have a UA6176 which works fine for vocals with my M149, but I'm going to track drums in January and therefore need something special. I have tried to find some answers here on these pages, but find it hard to draw any conclusions based on what I've read. Seems just like Harmony Central where people review things they've allready bought and totally slander it once they're bored with it.
I want to buy some Neve-clones and this is the list I've ended up with:

Aurora GTQ2
Great River MP2 NV (mercanary ed.)
Phoenix Audio DRS2
Vintech 473
ORAM Octasonic (not a Neve-clone, but still......)
and possibly the Seventh Circle stuff.

Seems like you can't go wrong with the Great River gear (what happened with the MP4 by the way?), but still the Aurora preamp is made of a former Neve-engineer who should know what he's doing (?).
I'll have to buy one of these without testing them as this is pretty exotic stuff in my country. Could any of you give a good advice on which to pick based on your experience? As mentioned I'm going to use them for drums, but also other things. The Neves I've heard have a distinct character to me which just feels right and this is what I'm after. I'm after the SOUND, not the marketing strategy nor the exact historically correct blueprint of a 1073.
I guess this has been disgussed to death allready, but I would love to hear some realworld experience on this topic.
Logged
Thomas Brekke

www.stungunz.com

chetatkinsdiet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2004, 11:26:39 AM »

For drums, it's hard to beat an API or clone type pre.  For not a lot of money, you should be able to grab a little API, OSA or Brent Averill lunchbox and fill it up.  The OSA pres run $450-600 or so ea.  The lunchbox itself will run about $500.  
As for the Neve clones, I'm really happy with my Vintech Dual 72 pre for the kick and snare.  
later,
m
Logged

Patrick Brannen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2004, 02:52:34 PM »

The Vintech X81 absolutely KILLS!
Logged

auralman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2004, 04:38:23 PM »

Thomas Brekke wrote on Mon, 13 December 2004 11:58


The Neves I've heard have a distinct character to me which just feels right and this is what I'm after. I'm after the SOUND, not the marketing strategy nor the exact historically correct blueprint of a 1073.



They all do a good job of amplifying mics. But if you're not looking for the historically correct "blueprint" of a Neve, then I'm not sure what the question is. I've not heard the Aurora, but..
the Great River doesn't have as much distortion as I like coming from the Neve 'family'
the Phoenix is a modern clone. Spot on.
the Vintech does, indeed kill...
the Oram (now I'm lost, because you're right, Oram sounds nothing like Neve stuff?)
I really like the 7th Circle pres. They distort the same way as the 1081s I grew to love. I've never done a side by side comparison with a 1073, but I'm sure they're quite different. But are they good? Yes, quite.

As long as you're into more colored sounds, other options (not "Neve"ish but we're already quite a ways from that aren't we?

APIs are lovely on drums. The 3124 is a fine investment.

The John Hardy pres are lovely, as well. And you can buy direct from John, which is a pleasure due to his being a truly nice guy.
Logged

mr.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2004, 05:16:58 PM »

 Smile  I understand John Oram isn't exactly top of the pops in this forum, but anyway I included the Octasonic as I've been offered a new one for 60% less than retail. Still if Oram products are half as bad as the sharp tongues around here claim, they must be worse than Behringer pres.

Yes, I want the Neve-sound, but from what I've read here there was a rather tedious (and long) argument whether Vintech pres are Neve-inspired or "the same as...". I don't think the sound of the units was discussed at all....
In other words I want the sound with color and punch, but with less noise and other "vintage" side-effects if I can. I'm not a purist in the sense that "oh, it's not the same plastic knobs" or "the LEDs don't come from the original supplier".
I guess I'm going for the Vintech 473 after all. It seems to have the most features: four channels, basic eq and great price. Thanks for the input.

Logged
Thomas Brekke

www.stungunz.com

Fletcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2004, 08:31:55 PM »

Wow... this is fun to watch... my only question so far is if any of y'all know what a "Neve sound" is?  ...or what it is you like about the "Neve sound"... or what about the "Neve sound" intrigues you most?

There are several different modules that constitute the "Neve" family, so, are we talking "10 series" are we talking "33" series, "31" series?  ...or are we just digging the concept of something sounding "large" being the "Neve" sound... or is it a 'distortion' that we think makes things bigger that we are intrerpreting as the "Neve sound"

I don't mean to break balls [OK, I probably do]... and I am really trying to encourage a freedom of expression here, but not a perpetuation of bullshit myth.
Logged
CN Fletcher

mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid


"Recording engineers are an arrogant bunch.  
If you've spent most of your life with a few thousand dollars worth of musicians in the studio, making a decision every second and a half... and you and  they are going to have to live with it for the rest of your lives, you'll get pretty arrogant too.  It takes a certain amount of balls to do that... something around three"
Malcolm Chisholm

thestudio

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 41
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2004, 10:49:40 PM »

Why don't we use the word "FAT" because all the companies who sell re-designs of Neve circuits use it in their advertisements to sell more units. Shocked



Logged

zmix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2828
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2004, 03:45:37 AM »

Fletcher wrote on Mon, 13 December 2004 20:31

Wow... this is fun to watch... my only question so far is if any of y'all know what a "Neve sound" is?  ...or what it is you like about the "Neve sound"... or what about the "Neve sound" intrigues you most?

There are several different modules that constitute the "Neve" family, so, are we talking "10 series" are we talking "33" series, "31" series?  ...or are we just digging the concept of something sounding "large" being the "Neve" sound... or is it a 'distortion' that we think makes things bigger that we are intrerpreting as the "Neve sound"

I don't mean to break balls [OK, I probably do]... and I am really trying to encourage a freedom of expression here, but not a perpetuation of bullshit myth.



Right on Mr F. ! Right F-in on!

We are trapped by the utterence of magic words...

If anyone has any meaningful experience with Neve modules, they will discover that there are quite a number of differences within a single number series. Not to mention the differences between the different series'. Do the 'clones' go for any particular artifact? What do you want from the module?

What if the 283 card's bias trimmer is adjusted incorrectly?    I might like the asymetrical clipping of a 1064, 66 or 73 on a kick or snare, but this might be terrible on a vocal. Who makes what out there? I know Dan Kennedy. He's a great designer and really knows more about design and system integration than most 'outboard' gear manufacturers. I spent a day at his lab listening to output transformers and it was any eye opener to hear the 'measures' good versus the 'sounds' good.

Is anyone who isn't on the cutting edge of record production going to accept the fringe application of technology as marketable? "Neve" connotes both 'solid' and 'edgy' for the average novice, and the cloners are playing both sides of that.

What does that get us? MOR....

mr.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2004, 04:22:59 AM »

 Smile Ok, I think we're drifting slightly off the point. The preamps I've asked about are mainly 1073-clones. So let me rephrase what I'm looking for: I want the "NEVE 1073 SOUND". Sorry about the great confusion and frustration this generalization has provoked...........Twisted Evil

I live in a country where I'm not able to try out these units. I like 1073s and would like a unit that replicates the SOUND of a good 1073. Therefore I turn to this forum where a lot of people have hands on experience with the preamps in question. Ok, now we have established what I'm after and why I ask the questions. Again....
Logged
Thomas Brekke

www.stungunz.com

zmix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2828
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2004, 04:45:56 AM »

Thomas,

Sorry about the topic drift...

What particular characteristic is it that you seek?

It might by good to quantify your preference, since each of these clones differ slightly from a typical 1073.

AMS-Neve is making a clone which has the same PC boards as the original, and nobody else has anything that 'authentic'...

mr.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2004, 05:30:46 AM »

Ok, I would like a 1073 that does drums, vocals and bass really well. I don't want it to airy and hifi and it need to have substance in the lows. My feeling is that a lot of class A circuits have a lot of punch and a cool, often subtle compression in certain areas of the spectrum. This "compression" or "fatness" is something I associate with the Neves I've heard. Seems like the Vintech 473 could be the one for me. Almost everyone says they're great (except some dealers who don't sell them.......).
From what I've read so far it seems like Great Rivers NVs are good, but a bit clean and Phoenix DRS is a bit airy, bright and uncolored. But well, it could be that the difference between these pre's is quite small, but give me a hint if I'm doing something foolish..............

The best price I've been offered on the 473 and power supply, is $2800. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Better deal, anyone......?
 
Logged
Thomas Brekke

www.stungunz.com

Fletcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2004, 06:36:21 AM »

Thomas Brekke wrote on Tue, 14 December 2004 05:30

My feeling is that a lot of class A circuits have a lot of punch and a cool, often subtle compression in certain areas of the spectrum. This "compression" or "fatness" is something I associate with the Neves I've heard.


Sure.  There are a bunch of units that accomplish that sort of "fatness" [it's not really a compression, it's more of a whole bunch of even order harmonic distortion coupled with a mediocre slew rate], that "fatness" comes mostly as a byproduct of the transformer design employed in the circuit.


Quote:

Seems like the Vintech 473 could be the one for me. Almost everyone says they're great (except some dealers who don't sell them.......).


Oh shit... (kicks dirt, stares at the ground), like I haven't heard that accusation a bazillion times.  Look ace, M-A has had the opportunity to carry Vintech for years, M-A doesn't carry Vintech because of a consious decision that was based on experience... you want to draw a different conclusion, knock yourself out, the fact of the matter is that nobody in our joint was wild about them, so we don't carry them.  

Ya know what, we could carry Pro-Tools too if we wanted to... guess what, we don't wanna.

Now, with that said the Vintech 473 could be great for your applications, could be the greatest thing you've touched since you discovered what your pecker is for... but there ain't nobody on any forum anywhere that will be able to come up with the answer for you... except you of course.

If you're looking for validation of a purchase decision, fine... but the fact of the matter is that if you're looking for a 1073 get a 1073, AMS-Neve makes them [M-A doesn't sell those either, but we highly recommend them... go figure], if you want to buy a unit based on the 1073 design, then the Vintech may indeed be right for you... but it's NOT A 1073.  I would hope that people will make their decisions from actual listening instead of from hype/bullshit marketing.

Quote:

From what I've read so far it seems like Great Rivers NVs are good, but a bit clean and Phoenix DRS is a bit airy, bright and uncolored. But well, it could be that the difference between these pre's is quite small, but give me a hint if I'm doing something foolish..............


The only thing I can see that you're doing that's foolish is trying to make a purchasing decision based on something other than your own experience with the product.  The Great River and the Phoenix sound like the Great River and the Phoenix.  Neither was intended to sound like a 1073.

The Great River started with the 1073 drawing, and that's where the similarities end.  The component selection is different, the transformers are very different, the features, the functions... all different.  

The Phoenix is even more different.  Phoenix Audio started by making Class A replacement op-amps for the class A/B "BA-440" op-amps in 8078 and 8068 style consoles [particularly for the 3415 line amplifier module].  This op-amp was designed by David Rees [who used to work for the old "Rupert Neve Company"... he's actually the guy that designed the 2254 compressor/limiter], it was made as a replacement part to "fatten up" the sound from 8068's and 8078's... it just turned out that it made a cool mic pre so they started to sell it as a stand alone pre.  

Seeing that Phoenix was originally in the business of refurbishing old Neve desks they had a ton of the red "Marconi" knobs and the little gray 'Neve Knobs' so they threw them onto the units... it was more about being too lazy or too cheap to do research into finding new knobs, it was NEVER about trying to be a "Neve clone" by any stretch of the imagination.

Now... with all that said... there are some other things you might owe it to yourself to look into... like the Helios stuff.  That is also a different sound than a "Neve" sound, but it's usually no less "fat" [or is it "phat"?] sounding, but again, they're different [and M-A doesn't pimp them so there is zero financial motivation in that recommendation]... there is the Chandler stuff, and as you've also mentioned, there is the Aurora stuff [Geoff used to be a draftsman for the old "Rupert Neve Company"... used to do stuff with Phoenix Audio too back when they refurbished old Neve desks before starting his own thing]... and the 7th Circle kit [which I haven't heard, but have been told by a few friends that it's really fun to fuck around with swapping different transformers in and out of the circuit to create different tones and textures].

Quote:

The best price I've been offered on the 473 and power supply, is $2800. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Better deal, anyone......?  


There I can be of no assistance... but if you're into putting in the energy you can call around to all the dealers and pit one against the other unitl they're ready to pay you to take the damn thing.

BTW, what country are you in?
Logged
CN Fletcher

mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid


"Recording engineers are an arrogant bunch.  
If you've spent most of your life with a few thousand dollars worth of musicians in the studio, making a decision every second and a half... and you and  they are going to have to live with it for the rest of your lives, you'll get pretty arrogant too.  It takes a certain amount of balls to do that... something around three"
Malcolm Chisholm

Turbo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2004, 06:42:41 AM »

I don't know about Neve, but once you try any of the Chandler gear your UA will be collecting dust. My favourite is the LTD-1.

Nick
Logged

mr.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2004, 10:19:20 AM »

It obviously pays off throwing subtle remarks in your direction, Fletch  Twisted Evil As an answer to your question; I'm from Norway.
I appreciate all the useful info and insight which I find unbiased and honest. This is the stuff I'm after.
Remember the subtitle for this forum "I dunno.....whadda think". My point exactly......
Logged
Thomas Brekke

www.stungunz.com

Meriphew

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 208
Re: Neve-clones again (sorry)
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2004, 04:48:24 PM »

Fletcher wrote on Tue, 14 December 2004 03:36


Now... with all that said... there are some other things you might owe it to yourself to look into... like the Helios stuff.  That is also a different sound than a "Neve" sound, but it's usually no less "fat" [or is it "phat"?] sounding, but again, they're different

Fletcher - Have you tried the new Helios Type 69 pre/eq? If so, did you feel it was up to par (sonically and build wise) with API, Great River, and Chandler?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  All   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 19 queries.