R/E/P Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7  (Read 15557 times)

J.J. Blair

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12809
question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« on: July 15, 2009, 04:25:31 PM »

I have a '53 Fender TV faced Deluxe amp.  At some point, somebody changed the 6SC7 tubes for 12AX7s.  Anybody here familiar enough with these?  I'm wondering how different the response will be if I put 6SC7s back in.
Logged
studio info

They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.

"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher

"The negative aspects of this business, not only will continue to prevail, but will continue to accelerate in madness. Conditions aren't going to get better, because the economics of rock and roll are getting closer and closer to the economics of Big Business America." - Bill Graham

bigaudioblowhard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1314
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2009, 09:32:45 PM »

I don't have any of my tube substitution books here at the studio, (on the list) but at a glance I would guess the 6SC7 is 6 volts on the filament, as opposed to 12 volts on a 12AX7.

bab

compasspnt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16266
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2009, 10:08:40 PM »

Voltage on both is 6.3v, is it not?
Logged

Dan Kennedy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 170
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2009, 11:12:05 PM »

6sc7 is a dual triode octal socket with a common cathode.

I didn't dig real deep, but I'd suspect it's a bit higher in filament current, but pretty much the same performance as a 12AX7 and would be a direct substitute, with a socket change.

The difference in modern 12AX7's sound would probably swamp out the sound of the substitution.
Logged

J.J. Blair

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12809
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2009, 11:37:03 PM »

Yeah.  Thanks, guys.  

Whoever did this swapped the sockets.  NOS Amphenol bakelite octal sockets are plenty available and cheap if I want to change back.  It appears that on one of the 12AX7s, a cathode self bias circuit was added, and there a couple resistors in line, as well as some caps added on the pins.  I didn't see which pins it was, to see if it's something tying the two sides of the dual triode together, but all these things don't exist on the original schematic, when the 6SC7 is employed.

Seeing how these amps are going for like $3,000 for beat up ones, maybe I should make it as original as possible.  I still don't get why these amps are worth so much money, and Ampegs aren't.  I don't honestly find this any more appealing than my R12 Rocket, and my Gemini kicks the crap out of just about any tweed Fender I've ever heard.  
Logged
studio info

They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.

"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher

"The negative aspects of this business, not only will continue to prevail, but will continue to accelerate in madness. Conditions aren't going to get better, because the economics of rock and roll are getting closer and closer to the economics of Big Business America." - Bill Graham

GaryR47

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2009, 10:45:03 AM »

compasspnt wrote on Wed, 15 July 2009 20:08

Plate voltage on both is 6.3v, is it not?



I believe you're thinking of filament voltage.  The plate(anode) voltage depends on supply voltage, cathode voltage, plate load resistor, etc.  But I'm sure you knew that.  No pun intended.

Gary

Michael Brebes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2009, 12:30:07 PM »

Like someone said, the 6SC7 an octal base tube which is also in a metal can.  Sounds a lot different than a  12AX7.  Has a lot less gain.  If you are not going to put it back to original, I would opt for a 12AY7, which has a gain more similar to the original tube and it was used in the later tweed Deluxe amps.
Logged

compasspnt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16266
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2009, 02:21:24 PM »

GaryR47 wrote on Thu, 16 July 2009 10:45

compasspnt wrote on Wed, 15 July 2009 20:08

Plate voltage on both is 6.3v, is it not?



I believe you're thinking of filament voltage.  The plate(anode) voltage depends on supply voltage, cathode voltage, plate load resistor, etc.  But I'm sure you knew that.  No pun intended.

Gary


Oops, yes, thanks!
Logged

J.J. Blair

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12809
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2009, 03:17:59 PM »

mbrebes wrote on Thu, 16 July 2009 09:30

Like someone said, the 6SC7 an octal base tube which is also in a metal can.  Sounds a lot different than a  12AX7.  Has a lot less gain.  If you are not going to put it back to original, I would opt for a 12AY7, which has a gain more similar to the original tube and it was used in the later tweed Deluxe amps.


Hmmm.  Perhaps this is why they switched to the 12AX7, to get higher gain.

Does the 6SN7 have more gain than the 6SC7?
Logged
studio info

They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.

"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher

"The negative aspects of this business, not only will continue to prevail, but will continue to accelerate in madness. Conditions aren't going to get better, because the economics of rock and roll are getting closer and closer to the economics of Big Business America." - Bill Graham

Dan Kennedy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 170
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2009, 07:10:18 PM »

Now that I'm at work and have my receiving tube manual in front of me, the 6SC7 is a "high-mu" dual triode, with an amplification factor of 70 vs the 12AX7's 100.

The 6SN7 is much lower gain at amp factor of 20.

The 12AY7 and 12AZ7 are closest in gain to the 6SC7 at 60.

The plate resistance and transconductance of each are different, so how they sound and ultimately perform is going to be all over the map as well. Not huge differences, but you'll hear it.
Logged

MagnetoSound

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2589
Re: question for you tube geeks: 6SC7 replaced with 12AX7
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2009, 05:33:20 AM »

bigaudioblowhard wrote on Thu, 16 July 2009 02:32

I don't have any of my tube substitution books here at the studio, (on the list) but at a glance I would guess the 6SC7 is 6 volts on the filament, as opposed to 12 volts on a 12AX7.



Don't forget, the 12A*7 series has a 12.6 volt filament with a centre tap. It is usually configured as two 6.3v heaters in parallel.  Smile

Logged

Music can make me get right up out of my chair and start dancing or it can get me so pumped up I have to walk around the block.
It can also knock me back and make me sit there and cry like a little baby. This shit is as powerful as any drug!!!
- Larry DeVivo

Stephen Payne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 67
Logged
Steve
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 20 queries.